Blue diamond exhaust from a 3D printed copper liquid engine

Oct 23, 2026 Last reply: 10 hours ago 3 Replies
Jump to replies (3)

The first thing that caught my attention here is the exhaust itself: a narrow blue and purple plume with clearly defined shock diamonds, held steady across a 25 second burn. A clean, stable pattern like that is not something you see every day from a printed engine, and it made me sit up right away.



The engine, named the E1-LOXCOOL725, is a liquid design printed in copper alloy on an EOS M290 machine. The assembly combines a metallic bell nozzle with the combustion chamber, and it runs liquid oxygen through the walls for regen cooling. On the plumbing side there is insulated piping plus flexible braided metal feed lines, which strikes me as a tidy way to route propellant on a stand.



The firing was horizontal, with the engine mounted on a test stand inside a corrugated metal shipping container. The maker ran it at 588 psi with an O/F mix ratio of 2.4, and the measured C* efficiency came out at 98 percent. For a printed copper chamber, that efficiency figure is genuinely impressive in my view.



After the burn, the injector and combustion chamber were inspected, and there was no melting or damage anywhere. Launcher clearly got the cooling path right. One thing still open is the color question: whether the blue comes from the copper engine or simply from burning very clean has not been settled, and I would enjoy seeing that pinned down.



Project by Launcher. Watch it on their YouTube channel:

formatting link


Going with copper alloy for a printed chamber is a bold call, and pairing it with liquid oxygen for regen cooling is a serious engineering bet. The post-firing inspection showing no melting or damage on the injector or chamber is, in my view, the payoff for that choice.

I am curious about the test stand setup. With a horizontal firing inside a corrugated metal shipping container, how were the insulated piping and the flexible braided metal feed lines routed to the engine? Did the container layout shape how the plumbing had to run?

For a next iteration I would suggest a longer duration test. The 25 second run ended with a clean chamber, so stretching the burn time would show where the regen cooling limits actually sit. A vertical firing could also be worth trying, to compare the plume pattern against this horizontal configuration.

Join the Discussion

Have something to add? Share your thoughts — no account required.

Didn't find your answer?

Ask the community — no account required