build 2003160 problem

I'm having a problem with date code 2003160. We have our nmsd.exe updated as of January, so *that* problem is taken care of within our office.

We're using a contractor who's having typical problems with an earlier build (2003010);

formatting link
We've sent him our files (an assembly) in 2003160 and he's getting crashes and sections not regenerating etc. If he updates to the replacement 2003161 build (along with the nmsd.exe patch) then works on the files and saves them within 2003161, will they be messed up? Will they be likely to crash etc if he sends them back to me and I regenerate them in my 2003160 build?

I know the answer is for all of us to upgrade to the latest build, but we can't do that right now for various reasons.

Reply to
Gra-gra
Loading thread data ...

Anyone, people?

Reply to
Gra-gra

David Janes

: > We're using a contractor who's having typical problems with an earlier : > build (2003010); : >

: >

formatting link
>

: > We've sent him our files (an assembly) in 2003160 and he's getting : > crashes and sections not regenerating etc. If he updates to the : > replacement 2003161 build (along with the nmsd.exe patch) then works : > on the files and saves them within 2003161, will they be messed up? : > Will they be likely to crash etc if he sends them back to me and I : > regenerate them in my 2003160 build? : >

: > I know the answer is for all of us to upgrade to the latest build, but : > we can't do that right now for various reasons.

Reply to
David Janes

I think he's re-worked the offending parts. They haven't been sent back to us yet to see how they open here. Nevertheless there *have* been problems with different date codes of 2001 and the URL below details this.

Reply to
Gra-gra

: > David Janes : : I think he's re-worked the offending parts. They haven't been sent : back to us yet to see how they open here. Nevertheless there *have* : been problems with different date codes of 2001 and the URL below : details this. : : How could I have missed and not checked out the link you provided!?! But, now that I've read it, the way it looks, the contractor with 161 should not have the same section regeneration problems as before and when they open and save the files, they should be backward compatible within all builds of

2001 (including yours). So, if the contractor had an earlier build, the 161 replacement should fix the crashing problem. Good luck.

David Janes

Reply to
David Janes

PolyTech Forum website is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here. All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.