Well, Paul, unless you "signed" it anonymously (in which case, you're listed as
'name not
displayed'), then you're not listed.
JANES
BTW, for the jousters at menuing "logic" or at how useable, "user friendly", or
"intuitive" software
may be, well, "it depends", yes, and the conditionals are, namely, experience
and expectation
(which, btw, is much based on experience.) And these are much like first loves
or like the fond
smells of suckling at ones mothers teet: powerful, in the half remembered
background of instinctive
reactions, but largely unreliable in the decision making process. IOW, I've
heard these comments for
20 years, at each and every change in software, and then they dissipate when
persons involved become
more familiar with what it is, what it does and with the manifold ways it's been
improved. So, as
opposed to the aristocratic suggestion that 'familiarity breed contempt', in
this case, familiarity
brings respect, acceptance, even defence.
"Paul Gress" wrote in message
On 07/ 5/11 04:18 PM, Grahame Ward wrote:
Polytechforum.com is a website by engineers for engineers. It is not affiliated with any of manufacturers or vendors discussed here.
All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.