RC Time constant formulas

Ive bin using the 555 timer IC for years and ive never questioned the formulas. I blindly plug what i need into the formula and get the
results. Most on this forum are already familiar with the formulas in question but for the novices, these are the ones im referring to:
Astable Mode: charge time T1 = 0.693(Ra + Rb)C Discharge time T2 = 0.693RbxC
Monostable Mode T = 1.1RC
Can someone fill me in on where the numbers .693 and 1.1 come from ?
Thanx.
Add pictures here
<% if( /^image/.test(type) ){ %>
<% } %>
<%-name%>
Add image file
Upload
I believe these factors are the times in relation to the RC fomulae against the difference between the top and bottom switching thresholds. Have to look at an RC curve and plot 1/3 to 2/3 (I think) voltage change.

Add pictures here
<% if( /^image/.test(type) ){ %>
<% } %>
<%-name%>
Add image file
Upload

Hi, I also have a question about 555 timers. If you take Ra out of the timer circuit (ie set it to 0), does this mean the mark-space ratio will be exactly 5? Will the circuit still operate?
regards, -Duncan
Add pictures here
<% if( /^image/.test(type) ){ %>
<% } %>
<%-name%>
Add image file
Upload
On 6 Sep 2003 19:46:33 -0700, snipped-for-privacy@aol.com wrote:

When you're discharging a capacitor, the factor is exp(-t/T) where t is time and T is the RC product. Since exp(-ln(2)) is exactly 1/2, at t = .693RC is the point where the voltage has fallen to 1/2 of it's initial value. On the 555, the internal comparitors are set at 2/3 and 1/3 of Vcc, so the "initial" value here is 2/3 Vcc and the halfway point is 1/3 Vcc.
The 1.1 comes from the internal "turn off" comparitor's setpoint at 2/3 Vcc. The trigger "discharges" the comparitors (turning on the output) so we need to get back to the "turn off" point. The charge time curve is (1 - exp(-t/T)) and so we need 2/3 = (1 - exp(-t/T)) or t = -ln(1/3)RC.
--
Rich Webb Norfolk, VA

Add pictures here
<% if( /^image/.test(type) ){ %>
<% } %>
<%-name%>
Add image file
Upload
wrote:

Thanks Rich, thats exactly what i was looking for. I just tried that out on my "scientific" calculator and it worked out just like you suggested.
t = -1n(0.333)RC = 1.0987 RC
Rounding off gives 1.1 RC for the mono....perfect.
Im still abit sketchy on the logic behind the astable but it works:
t = exp(-1n(2))RC = 0.693RC
Thanx again much appreciated.
Add pictures here
<% if( /^image/.test(type) ){ %>
<% } %>
<%-name%>
Add image file
Upload
On 8 Sep 2003 14:38:46 -0700, snipped-for-privacy@aol.com wrote:

Hmmm... case where having fancy fonts and formatting would have come in handy in a usenet posting. We'll do this without HTML, tho...
That expression is (voltage at time t) = V0 * e to the (- t/T). To switch states, the voltage has to fall (rise) from 2/3 Vcc to 1/3 Vcc (or vicy versa), a factor of 2. So, for the falling voltage case, (e ^ (-t/T)) must equal 1/2.
Manipulate that to (-t/T) = (log base n) of 1/2, or t = - ln(2) * T. The T is the RC time constant.
--
Rich Webb Norfolk, VA

Add pictures here
<% if( /^image/.test(type) ){ %>
<% } %>
<%-name%>
Add image file
Upload
wrote:

Thanx again Rich, that has cleared up a few misunderstandings and blunderings on my part.
Im beginning to see why ive never seen the question raised about the formulae used in the 555 timer. Appears one would require some knowledge of calculus and differencial equations to get a full grasp on the concepts involved. The last time ive even looked at a calculus book (or algebra for that matter) was over 13 years ago, so im abit rusty ( no surprise ;-) )
Anyway after an exhaustive search and postings to various news groups and forums, heres what ive got ( appart from a pounding headache ):]
For the 555 Monostable:
2/3 = 1-e ^ (-t/RC) -1/3 = -e ^ (-t/RC) 1/3 = e ^ (-t/RC)
1n (1/3) = -t/RC
-1.0986123 = -t/RC
t = 1.0986123 RC
Rounded off gives t = 1.1RC used in the 555 Monostable.
For the 555 Astable:
( Charging time ) t1 = -1n (1/2)(Ra+Rb)C = 0.693(Ra+Rb)C
( Dicharging time ) t2 = -1n(1/2)(Rb)C = 0.693(Rb)C
With a bit of thought it can be seen that this idea applies, not just to the 555 timer, but to timer and oscillator design in general.
Thanx again...i an go away a little wiser.
Net.
Add pictures here
<% if( /^image/.test(type) ){ %>
<% } %>
<%-name%>
Add image file
Upload
snipped-for-privacy@aol.com wrote:

FYI: Your equations show 1n (one-n) instead of ln (L-n).
It seems like you can't see the forest from the trees. The concept of the 555 is dirt simple if you keep in mind the internal voltage divider. All 3 internal resistors are the same value (or damn near the same values). Because of this the it forms a voltage divider of two types: an upper limit (for the upper voltage cutoff) and a lower limit (for the lower voltage cutoff). Since the lower voltage divider is
[R/(R+R+R)]V = 1/3V
and the upper voltage divider is
[(R+R)/(R+R+R)]V = 2/3V
these form the comparator 'window' of operating voltages.
The external capacitor and resistor form the charging and relaxation circuit. The time constant as mentioned (t) is the the time of charging and decay of the external resistor and capacitor circuit. The time constant is only important in respect to how long it takes for the capacitor to charge up to the upper limit to trigger the output to go low. Once the output is low, it drains off the capacitor to the lower voltage (1/3)V and is then set high (to V) to recharge the capacitor. The time constant is *only* in respect to the external resistor and capacitor values, since that is what determines the time it will take to reach the upper limit 2/3V and the time that it will take to reach the lower limit 1/3V.
If the internal resistors were not equal, then the numbers 1.1 and 0.7 are totally meaningless!!!
Please keep this in mind. Hope this helps.
:-)
Add pictures here
<% if( /^image/.test(type) ){ %>
<% } %>
<%-name%>
Add image file
Upload
wrote:

Ack! yes that should have bin ln , which also looks logical since it means " natural logarithm". Thnx for catching that, hadnt noticed.

I totally agree.

Add pictures here
<% if( /^image/.test(type) ){ %>
<% } %>
<%-name%>
Add image file
Upload

Polytechforum.com is a website by engineers for engineers. It is not affiliated with any of manufacturers or vendors discussed here. All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.