How about a normal conversation, or a transcript of one. Words appear in the same order they were spoken. New comments NEVER precede the question they are responding to.
No?
Do you understand that?
Bob Kaplow NAR # 18L TRA # "Impeach the TRA BoD" >>> To reply, remove the TRABoD!
Chris seems to think that it's a game of Jeopardy, and not a conversation. You know, where you get the'answer' first then go on to discover the question.
Correcting you is not a 'misleading' statement. Or was that supposed to be 'mis-sledding', as in falling off a toboggan? ;-) (No personal insults intended!)
Now, I realize I'm going against my own previous statement about ending the thread, but speaking of toboggans, I have an on-topic update...
I lit some motors on my test stand with some friends yesterday (25 deg F) and we verified a difference of about 15% in reduced "delivered ISP" compared to 75F. This included reduced thrust and increased burn time, along with a reduced total impulse. Another side effect on a couple of the motors was some 'chuffing', most likely due to reduced initial start-up pressure. Those were lower Kn designs, so it didn't take much to get them below the required ignition pressure. Completely unscientific methods, but an interesting experiment nonetheless.
Since it could be important to performance and safety, it's useful to be aware of the temperature affect on APCP efficiency. Scientific papers and textbooks discuss it, but it would be nice to run a complete series of tests on some of the propellant formulas commonly available to consumers and amateurs.
Any time someone says toboggan, I think of the guy on the toboggan who friends bailed when they realized it was pointing straight at DuckCreek. Unfortunately, his feet/legs were in the rope and he went down the broken up concrete bank onto the frozen pond. Pretty messed up.
Was there any deviation in the test stand due to the cold? Not that we're likely to see that large a swing here.
There seems to be enough prophecy and parable about god and light as being one that a rational person might take it literally as a postulate to "discover" the physicality of god.
Which motor(s) did you test? The chuffing is a dead giveaway that the motors are not designed for use at 25 Deg F., assuming of course that you ignited the motors properly.
Perhaps, but more important would be actual sport rocket motor testing, possibly even labeling and certification, to specify minimum recommended initial motor temperature for use. In fact, I have been thinking of sending a letter to Jack Kane to get his observations on these issues. Perhaps the NFPA should be prompted to require minimum temperature labeling for each motor, or an additional certification requirement that all sport rocket motors must perform "well" at say 0 Deg. F. I think it is unreasonable to determine the low temperature limit in at certification testing, but the manufacturer could provide the low temperature limit as they do with maximum recommended launch weight.
Personally, I never fly APCP motors in cold weather, and even in cool weather, I try to keep them warm. The problem may be more common than I an aware of. I do know that professional APCP motors can be design to operated over a wide range of temperatures, say -60 Deg. F. I sport rocket motors are being flown temperatures too low for the particular motor, something should be done to alleviate the problem.
Go read any other news group. Even rec.humor with it's 10 level quotes is bottom posted.
Me thinks you're the person who is clueless. I suggest you try this link:
formatting link
No, this is clearly bottom posting. To use your posting style it would look like this:
CT: A - Red.
don't even know what the response applies to. Like this: We bring up the unfortunate affairs of Mr. Wheeler to make three points. The first two are noncontroversial. First, in many domains in life, success and satisfaction depend on knowledge, wisdom, or savvy in knowing which rules to follow and which strategies to pursue. This is true not only for committing crimes, but also for many tasks in the social and intellectual domains, such as promoting effective leadership, raising children, constructing a solid logical argument, or designing a rigorous psychological study. Second, people differ widely in the knowledge and strategies they apply in these domains ( Dunning, Meyerowitz, & Holzberg, 1989 ; Dunning, Perie, & Story, 1991 ; Story & Dunning, 1998 ), with varying levels of success. Some of the knowledge and theories that people apply to their actions are sound and meet with favorable results. Others, like the lemon juice hypothesis of McArthur Wheeler, are imperfect at best and wrong-headed, incompetent, or dysfunctional at worst.
Perhaps more controversial is the third point, the one that is the focus of this article. We argue that when people are incompetent in the strategies they adopt to achieve success and satisfaction, they suffer a dual burden: Not only do they reach erroneous conclusions and make unfortunate choices, but their incompetence robs them of the ability to realize it. Instead, like Mr. Wheeler, they are left with the mistaken impression that they are doing just fine. As Miller (1993) perceptively observed in the quote that opens this article, and as Charles Darwin (1871) sagely noted over a century ago, "ignorance more frequently begets confidence than does knowledge" (p. 3).]
I don't know what this is. Bottom posting does NOT repeat the question a second time. Your last two lines are EXACTLY how it should be written for clarity.
See above.
Bob Kaplow NAR # 18L TRA # "Impeach the TRA BoD" >>> To reply, remove the TRABoD!
PolyTech Forum website is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here.
All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.