Columbia Shuttle #1385

Anyone here ever built the Estes Columbia kit #1385? I'm in the middle of a kit bash and got to the point where the instructions say to make a flap on just one side. That just seems strange to me that you would only do it on one side. Anyone?

Randy

Reply to
<randyolb
Loading thread data ...

Randy,

The instructions do indeed say (and show) the flap (or should we say aileron) and I believe it was to allow for a circling glide.

John

Reply to
John Stein

DUH!!!! It parachute recovery. I was thinking of the wrong shuttle.

The flap was for spin going up for stability. I need new glasses.

John

Reply to
John Stein

pin during boost for stability during boost.

To avoid the deadly flight path of the later foam-orbiter-of-death.

-Fred Shecter NAR 20117

snipped-for-privacy@charter.net wrote:

middle of a

Reply to
shreadvector

It is not a glider.

Spin during boost for stability.

Reply to
shreadvector

Spin during boost for stability during boost.

To avoid the deadly flight path of the later foam-orbiter-of-death.

-Fred Shecter NAR 20117

snipped-for-privacy@charter.net wrote:

middle of a

Reply to
shreadvector

Ok, I can buy that. My first thoughts were also that the flap was for a circling glide effect because they only wanted a flap on one side but I knew that it recovers by chute.

I built the Centuri version in 1980 and still fly it. The two are very similar and the Centuri version does not use a flap but it does spin ever so slightly during flight. Since I'm building this one as the Armageddon Shuttle (from the movie) and it will have twin boosters next to the OMS pods anyway, I don't think the flap would make much difference in the flight profile for this version.

Randy

Reply to
<randyolb

PolyTech Forum website is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here. All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.