First launch of Columbia, 24 years ago today

And I was there.

I had left my job as editor of Model Retailer Magazine and was starting to work at the AMA, but I planned it with a two-week gap so I could drive from Virginia to Florida. I had wangled press credentials while I still had access to Model Retailer stationery. So I jumped in my AMC Pacer (yes, yes, I know...I must have gotten the good one they made that week) and drove 16 hours. Arrived at 5am the night of April 9, snuggled into the press parking lot, checked in, hit the men's room, and sacked out in the car for five hours with the radio on a local all-news station.

On the 10th, the day originally scheduled for the launch, I cruised the newsroom and the press gallery, and was amazed to find that several people had read my "Basics of Model Rocketry," which was published by Kalmbach a month before. One nice fellow even had his copy in his briefcase, and asked me to autograph it. Definitely one of my better days.

I wound up hanging with two editors from a British magazine who had perched themselves on the lip of a large dumpster at the edge of the press enclosure, a better vantage point than anything in the gallery. We diddled with our cameras as the count proceeded, then held, then proceeded again. Finally the count got down to 5 minutes and the computers were not synching up. After a period of suspense, Shuttle Launch Control came on the loudspeaker and announced the scrub, saying that they would try again in two days. One of the Brits turned to me with a pained expression and said, "Haven't they got anything else around that they can launch today?"

The Brits had to fly home that night, and I was faced with spending two days living in the Pacer. Fortunately, one of the folks offered me space on the couch in his rented condo in exchange for some flying lessons on the electric RC plane I had brought along. You never know when a model will come in handy. Two days later, Columbia thundered upstairs on the two largest model rocket motors ever built.

I know the Shuttle program is winding up, and I don't think that's a bad thing; it's time to build something better. But we should still be aware of what a tremendous achievement Shuttle has been. A reusable spaceship, built and flown while Congress was picking the budget to death, the single most complicated piece of engineering ever undertaken. We've flown 113 times and had three failures, two of which cost the vehicle and crew. Do the math. Losing those brave astronauts is hard, but the people of the Shuttle program have nothing to be ashamed of, and much to be proud of. Hell, I'm proud of it, and all I did was talk about it!

Doug Pratt dad-at-pratthobbies-dot-com

Reply to
pratthobbies
Loading thread data ...

That's probably more significant than the first shuttle launch. ; )

Randy

Reply to
<randyolb

I wasn't there for Columbia... 8( But I have seen the majority of the on-the-pad shutdowns for the shuttle! Uh, a dubious honor...

Happy "Cosm> And I was there.

...

Reply to
Will Marchant

Three?

Bob Kaplow NAR # 18L TRA # "Impeach the TRA BoD" >>> To reply, remove the TRABoD!

Reply to
Bob Kaplow

Did you get my email today??? Something is up with the tracon...

Reply to
Greg Cisko

Aha! I hoped someone would take the bait. Yes, three. Challenger had an abort-to-orbit when a faulty sensor shut down an SSME slightly early. They completed the mission normally.

I expected fellow Shuttleholic George Gassaway to pick up on that one. When I named my hybrid launch system RTLS, George was the only one who got the joke.

Reply to
pratthobbies

Columbia had a reputation of being a hard bird to get off the pad. I well remember an abort where two of the three SSMEs fired up and shut down. I got into a very hot argument with someone that day, who made the (probably deliberate) mistake of saying, "Well, I see that the Shuttle failed again today" in earshot. I responded, "Catching a fault and stopping the launch is a SUCCESS. Flying with a problem is a failure."

Reply to
pratthobbies

Actually, I thought there was more than one ATO in the shuttle program where an SSME shut down early. But I do recall the one you're talking about. A faulty sensor shut down one engine. They got another warning for one of the remaining engines, did some sort of sensor override, and pressed on to orbit.

George hasn't posted here in a LONG time...

I got it. I just didn't see the need to comment on it. At least you didn't name it after your Zero G toilet question :-)

Bob Kaplow NAR # 18L TRA # "Impeach the TRA BoD" >>> To reply, remove the TRABoD!

Reply to
Bob Kaplow

PolyTech Forum website is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here. All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.