Has this been done

Reply to
skydivertu
Loading thread data ...

what about consumerism? Doesn't the state prefer us to spend money on empty calorie foods and become fat and unhealty so we can spend yet more money on vitamins, doctors, medications, fitness tapes and retreats, liposuction, and psychotherapy? And then levy a tax on all these purchases to boot? Then have us sink into ever-increasing debt so we can pay interest on our credit cards and home equity loans, which we become crushed by until the bank forecloses and resells the house and car at a profit? And then our wife divorces us so we can pay alimony and child support, to include private school tuition because the local public school has a 34% graduation rate?

say, where's my prozac? :o(

"they all come to look for America" - Paul Simon

- iz

Arnold Roquerre wrote:

Reply to
Ismaeel Abdur-Rasheed

Didn't we have this thread already?

I think so. I remember the answer:

"Sharp stick."

Zooty

Reply to
zoot

What's good for lawyers is good for congress and the tax system.

Jerry

Reply to
Jerry Irvine

Neither was I.

Get in line, there are at least two oher people in our club wanting to do the same thing

Reply to
tater schuld

snip

I'd try it with a cat and enough weight to equal yours first. ; )

Randy

Reply to
Randy

Just a thought. Jerry isn't far from Hollywood, maybe Fox would make it a series and help with development.

Randy

Reply to
Randy

Let's see.....250 lb. man on a bicycle seat enduring 5+ G's = goodbye seat. I'm sure they could surgically remove it though.

Mike Fisher

Reply to
Mfreptiles

OUCH!!!!! ; )

Randy

Reply to
Randy

Isn't there a site with X-rays like that? :-)

Reply to
Chuck Rudy

Or it could lead to a new tv show.... The X-Piles. ; )

Randy

Reply to
Randy

I can get you some good video without you having to take the ride !

Reply to
Art Upton

I have a contingent contract for that. Have yet to find a nose cone and a volunteer. Until now.

Reply to
Jerry Irvine

Or how about the Governor of California?

formatting link
formatting link

Reply to
Jerry Irvine

Well... it WOULD give new meaning to the term "astronaught." ; )

Randy

Reply to
Randy

So the US and China have never out people in space?

Reply to
Steven P. McNicoll

Was he not a US citizen?

Reply to
Steven P. McNicoll

You know, if you're going to respond to a month old thread, you should buy a clue first.

To my knowledge, only Russia chose to eject the "passenger" when they had ejection chairs down pat, but not capsule recovery. I don't recall what they did with the capsule after the pilot ejected, maybe you could use a search tool to do some research.

Joel. phx

Reply to
Joel Corwith

Technically, I stand corrected. Gemini actually had ejection ejection seats. So yes, the US Gemini program could have recovered the 'passenger' under his own chute. Even then it's probably stretching the "passenger can open his parachute and land" portion of the question.

And it was pointed out that the shuttle, while able to allow passengers to recover under chute, could not recover under chute on it's own. Unless of course you count the drogue chutes during braking.

Reply to
Joel Corwith

It appears you're the one without a clue. So here's one:

FOLLOW THE THREAD.

I don't need to do research. I know what they did with the capsule.

Reply to
Steven P. McNicoll

PolyTech Forum website is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here. All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.