I haven't done much more than open the box yet, but here are some
initial comments...
The box is huge, mostly air. The camera doesn't appear that vulnerable,
so I don't know why it's in such a big box, unless it's for shelf space
(instead of hang-tag space) since it's far more expensive. Contains
lower tube assembly with fins and coupler, upper tube, camera/nose cone,
parachute, shock cord, USB cable, CD, and instructions.
The rocket is designed to use D12-3 and D12-5 only. Haven't done any simulations to see if it would work with C11's. It would probably work okay with single-use Aerotech E motors, but the plastic fin can is one of those that has the 'screw on' back, so RMS motors won'ts work. Further, they glue the thrust ring in (no engine hook), so you're unable to fit the Estes 'E' engines in place.
The camera itself is very lightweight, and according to the specifications is sized for a BT-60 tube. Based on the other comments I'm making here, I'd definitely put it on another BT-60 rocket (or roll your own), instead of just flying it stock.
The only 'assembly' involves using plastic cement to glue the upper body tube to the plastic coupler, and putting the usual Estes paper shock cord mount in the tube. You must also attache the parachute. The good Using plastic glue on paper tubes/plastic couplers is a sure-fire way to have things fail, as the glue never seems to hold too terribly long for those materials. And what would it have taken to simply put the thrust ring in for an 'E' engine, and then supply a spacer for D-E use? And finally, I would imagine that most folks would want to launch it in the 'camera down' position, so would it really have been that difficult to add the 12" of braided cord to the kit? After all, for the kind of money they're asking for it, these are trivial details.
The camera itself seems fairly well thought out (despite the lack of flash or expandibility), but I'll reserve judgement until actually using it. One of the first things I'll have to do is to find a better BT-60 rocket to fly it on.
David Erbas-White
The box is huge, mostly air. The camera doesn't appear that vulnerable,
The rocket is designed to use D12-3 and D12-5 only. Haven't done any simulations to see if it would work with C11's. It would probably work okay with single-use Aerotech E motors, but the plastic fin can is one of those that has the 'screw on' back, so RMS motors won'ts work. Further, they glue the thrust ring in (no engine hook), so you're unable to fit the Estes 'E' engines in place.
The camera itself is very lightweight, and according to the specifications is sized for a BT-60 tube. Based on the other comments I'm making here, I'd definitely put it on another BT-60 rocket (or roll your own), instead of just flying it stock.
The only 'assembly' involves using plastic cement to glue the upper body tube to the plastic coupler, and putting the usual Estes paper shock cord mount in the tube. You must also attache the parachute. The good Using plastic glue on paper tubes/plastic couplers is a sure-fire way to have things fail, as the glue never seems to hold too terribly long for those materials. And what would it have taken to simply put the thrust ring in for an 'E' engine, and then supply a spacer for D-E use? And finally, I would imagine that most folks would want to launch it in the 'camera down' position, so would it really have been that difficult to add the 12" of braided cord to the kit? After all, for the kind of money they're asking for it, these are trivial details.
The camera itself seems fairly well thought out (despite the lack of flash or expandibility), but I'll reserve judgement until actually using it. One of the first things I'll have to do is to find a better BT-60 rocket to fly it on.
David Erbas-White