Well I was going to stay out of this, but I actually was pulled over for not
having a sticker, about 6 months after mine expired. The plate was clean
like when I use a razor to remove the old sticker, so it is possible that I
was distracted 1/2 through installation. I had the paperwork, so he didn't
write a ticket (if you don't have a valid insurance card, they write you a
ticket and you get to clear it up through the mail). New sticker was $5. I
do the X with the razor and it does make it a pain to remove.
Joel. phx
It didn't help that I've been installing a wireless remote for a couple of
years,... and he noticed panels missing as if I hot wired the vehicle.
I don't know. If I don't read the instructions for affixing the
sticker, I'm sure not looking for laws pertaining to properly affixing
it.
I find it hard to believe instructions exist for putting the stickers
on & also find it difficult to believe that people are actually
concerned about folowing them.
And what do you do when you have to carry more kids than the back seat
holds? Pick-up trucks seem to come with a passenger air bag disable switch.
Cars and other vehicles do not. In fact I had to scratch the Honda Insight
off my shopping list 3 years ago just because I couldn't ever use it to take
my daughter to/from school or day care bacause of that !%*@ air bag.
I really object to paying for air bags in cars. Air bags are designed to
protect ADULT IDIOTS too stupid to wear seat belts. At least 99% of air bags
are NEVER used; money wasted. Yet ABS is useful on a regular basis to
PREVENT the accident from happening. In fact ABS prevented me from smacking
into some ID ten T who pulled out right in front of me the third day I had
it. They should take all the manditory air bag money, and put it into ABS
and GOOD seat belts.
Another irony: when last car shopping, I found exactly ONE car that offered
as part of an option package five point seat belts. And it was a $10K option
on a $50K+ car!
Bob Kaplow NAR # 18L TRA # "Impeach the TRA BoD"
>>> To reply, remove the TRABoD!
I find it ironic that you can be ticketed for failing to have your kid
belted down in a child seat, yet the state stuffs them in a bus with no seat
belt, air bag, or other protection.
I guess that the kids would be safer walking to school, 5 miles uphill both
ways, through waist deep snow, like we did when we were kids.
Bob Kaplow NAR # 18L TRA # "Impeach the TRA BoD"
>>> To reply, remove the TRABoD!
You reminded me of another incident that happened recently (I only wish
I had been there for it...)
My wife was pulled over by the highway patrol because the officer saw my
12-year-old daughter moving her head and upper body to the music on the
radio. He decided that if she was able to do that, she must not be
wearing a seat belt, so pulled my wife and kids over. He walked up, my
wife asked him what was wrong, he said that my daughter wasn't wearing a
seat belt -- and she asked him to look (she was wearing it, and always
does).
Unfortunately, my wife was too upset to get his badge number...
David Erbas-White
I have a curious question for those who are well-informed about American
explosives regulations and related regulatory stuff.
I've recently replaced my 1984 Civic (with no air bags) with a 2000
Civic with front air bags. I've always wondered about a 'safety'
restraint system that can hurt or kill people. Now I'm driving around
with an explosive device aimed at my head (the driver side airbag).
Do air bags fall under the same restrictions as model rocket motors?
I wonder if they have to be labeled "Hazardous
Materials - Class 1 Explosives", or does everyone
just call them something like "emergency inflation
devices"?
-dave w
Ironic, but my complaint is that the state infringes on the right to
transport children. I would not even have mentioned the school bus
except that it is proof that requiring child safety restraints is
burdensome and unwarranted. Now the availability of safety equipment
is a good thing and their use should not be discouraged. However, the
nanny state should not require their use by consenting citizens in
private transportation, nor should law enforcement officers and
agencies. I think the state could and probably should require their
use in commercial and public transportation. And yes, I think c
busses should have simple cheap lap belts, and probably shoulder belts
as well.
There should probably be some carrot and stick encouragement to using
the safety equipment. However, this should come from the insurance
industry and supportive laws. E.g. if a driver or passenger was
proven to not be wearing a seat belt at the time of an accident, they
would forfeit all rights to sue or collect insurance for bodily
injury. Insurance companies could offer cash incentives to their
customers who install optional safety equipment, or buy demonstrably
safer cars...
Kids are getting fatter these days... It wasn't that bad for me.
During K-3 I typically walked 3 miles, although it seemed like 5, and
we usually had a car pool running in the winter. 4-5th grade was only
about a mile, and an easy bike ride. Middle school was probably
farther than 5 miles, but I usually rode the bus. It was a decent trip
by bicycle, but I'd only walk it in an emergency. (I also had an early
morning paper route during that time.) In HS I lived in the country
and I had to take the school bus. Of course then I had chores, like
baling hay for horses that I was allergic to...
Alan
> Bob Kaplow NAR # 18L TRA # "Impeach the TRA BoD"
> Save Model Rocketry from the HSA!
I agree that air bags are not cost effective. I don't even trust
them. A better solution would be the use of crash helmets. Of course
most cars don't have enough headroom, and I'm only 5-7 and I drive
lexs common version of a car without the sun roof.
I'd pay extra for ABS, but I don't think I could get it without
getting the airbags. I hate slack belts and I don't trust them. Too
often they just will not take up slack. I'd have them replaced with a
good belt system, but no garage will do the work. It seems there is a
law against installing better safety equipment.
I'd guess that was just an option for production vehicle race classes.
Alan
That was the original intention, yes. It later turned out the "seat
belt substitute" would quickly kill you if you weren't ALSO wearing
belts. At that point, it was too late to gracefully kill the airbag
concept, so it was implemented as a belt supplement.
In ideal circumstances, an airbag plus appropriate belts will be
slightly more effective than belts alone. However in other
circumstances, a trivial accident will result in severe injuries and
burns caused solely by the airbag. I've seen them in person, at an
accident site.
BTW, you'll see many glowing claims for "lives saved" by airbags.
Remember Twains third type of lie - statistics. What you don't see is
how these clains are measured. The truth: Every time an airbag deploys
and someone survives, it's a "life saved."
My greatest objection (and most likely the real reason car
manufacturers put the things in) is the premature removal of cars from
the market after minor accidents. If a fender bender deploys the bags,
you've added at least $1500 to the repair cost - far more on newer
multi-bag setups. Presto! The car is totaled, and a new one is sold
(even if not to you).
But when you need them they are worth their weight in gold. Two years
ago my wife was hit head-on by a driver who lost control of her car
and crossed the centerline. Both my wife and the other driver were
wearing their seat belts; my wife also had an airbag. My wife ended up
with a bruised spleen and a broken nose. The other driver died before
the paramedics arrived on the scene.
We both drive cars with airbags now.
Mario Perdue
NAR #22012 Sr. L2
for email drop the planet
formatting link
"X-ray-Delta-One, this is Mission Control, two-one-five-six, transmission
concluded."
PolyTech Forum website is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here.
All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.