> > > Hey, they put ANCP on the list!
> >
> > they did ?
> >
> > I din't see ANCP ?
> >
> > I only saw ANEM ?
> >
> > big difference ?
> >
> >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Made-ya-look!
>
> It was a joke.
>
> > >
> > > -- David
> > > >formatting link> >
> > >
> >
> >
>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Silly me !
Jerry,
What issue? Please amplify what the issue is and what the NAR should do.
Thank you,
Bev
Jerry Irv> >
Not in public thank you. I'll chat with one of the lawyers.
So are you going to invite me to the ATF new years party?
Jerry,
Sorry I can not invite you as I am not invited my self. Besides, I don't want to associate with people like that.
You chating with a lawyer does me no good. I just want to know what issue you have with the latest AFT explosives list. I don't think it has changed. And if you have an issue, what do youi want the NAR to do about it? Please explane. If you don't want to do it in public, just send it to my email address.
Thank you,
Bev
Jerry Irv> >
I agree.
NAR chose not to challenge the list at all. That was a choice.
It also erred by not withdrawing that cause of action.
But I am stating the obvious.
Jerry
Have something to add? Share your thoughts — no account required.
Ask the community — no account required