I am tempted to buy one just to support Gary's willingness to make such instrumentation available to experimenters.
I wonder if there is any software. I suppose the data sheet says.
Jerry
I am tempted to buy one just to support Gary's willingness to make such instrumentation available to experimenters.
I wonder if there is any software. I suppose the data sheet says.
Jerry
I couldn't find it. Anyone? AnyOne?
Wondering how it compares to:
I wonder what the market will be now that all EX guys need a LEUP. And possibly a LEMP.
And why would 'you' think ALL EX guys need an LEUP?
Joel. phx
HSA effectivly removed the instate loophole. Thats why the previously quiet ARSA suddenly became very vocal.
Of course you can still make motors under 62.5grams.
Then again I am not sure if it applies to raw AP, anyone know where to buy
62.5g batches of AP? ;-)RDH8
ONLY for non-exempt explosives.
It most certainly does not. In fact, more often than not it does not mean APCP.
ieas.org
What makes you think EX = APCP?
WRONG.
Joel. phx
I can make as big a motor as I wish.
Do you see AP on the explosives list? I didn't think so. Maybe it's time to read up on the law.
In the UK it usually means Hybrids. Several groups building their own hybrids, including this lot...
Speaking of which, any news from BR yet?
Not directly, though I heard from a UK based member that everything was going well.
Bingo. EX is all encompassing, including water propulsion. ieas.org
Mike Fisher
But let's not believe for a second that 'the powers' wish it to stay unregulated.
Joel. phx
Joel, Can you inlighten us as to how much EX work is done without APCP? I have just never seen the figures. And I don't mean hybrid or liquid. But composit motors. I know there are other oxidizers but I thought they were harder to work with. If not someone should tell NASA they figured it wrong. Oh and all the motor vendors too.
My name is not Joel. However I probably have a better overall feel.
Jerry
You know, I don't know either. I'll go out on a limb and say not all EX'ers want to be counted. But then I'm not implying that "everyone" uses APCP (by stating the HSA killed EX). Actually, all "I" have to show is that a single EX'r plays with something besides APCP. Here's 2:
Oh please. Harder than the mixture using the "common oxidizer" which has killed 'at least one' worker and completely destroyed a commercial facility?
NASA uses liquid oxidizers, what did they figure wrong? They have a very specific goal, and it's not the same as 'all' EX.
Just because NASA uses APCP in boosters, and motor manufactures use it for plugNshoot, "everyone" has to? Does everyone have to launch the type of rockets that NASA built and kit manufactures produce?
I hear your bridge calling you.
Joel. phx
They are.
-dave w
NOS/hybrids/ liquid/hypergolic fit in there somewhere as well. APCP is just a percent of EX/Amateur. Lets not forget H20 and steam either.
Mike Fisher Binder Design
remember "consumers" are excluded from this list or water and hybrids would be higher.
PolyTech Forum website is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here. All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.