[TROLLS] According to my sources

Feb 03, 2004 91 Replies

You missed a step at the beginning. The whole chapter on explosives does not apply if the substance is not explosive. Since APCP, in the form used for rocket motors, is not explosive (see definition below, key phrase is primary or common purpose), then none of the chapter applies.

Explosives. Any chemical compound, mixture, or device, the primary or common purpose of which is to function by explosion. The term includes, but is not limited to, dynamite and other high explosives, black powder, pellet powder, initiating explosives, detonators, safety fuses, squibs, detonating cord, igniter cord, and igniters.

Bob

Ok then, Do you have a business license? What city and county do you manufacture propellant in? Under what name? Who owns usr?

I thought USR was more of a brand name/product line than a specific, ownable "capital entity"...

-dave w

Somebody has to own it. If not, I claim it as mine.

Maybe not, but turn it into sawdust and you got yourself some great material for a fuel/air explosive.

Gee, I wonder what the phrase 'but is not limited to' means....

Joel. phx

Brand names and product lines are owned by someone, unless they are in the public domain. In which case, they would no longer fit the description of a brand name.

Ismaeel Abdur-Rasheed wrote in news:x3dUb.176925$ snipped-for-privacy@twister.nyc.rr.com:

That's not part of the original suit. That's in response to ATF's legal maneuvering.

len.

Jerry Irvine wrote in news: snipped-for-privacy@corp.supernews.com:

Wrong, and no.

len.

It is part of the jerry-amendment to the suit. Read the amended complaint.

Join the Discussion

Have something to add? Share your thoughts — no account required.

Didn't find your answer?

Ask the community — no account required