Why flat shock cords?

I am sure it is simply because "flat" is cheaper. It is also, I feel, far less likely to "zipper", as opposed to a round rope-like cord (though such an event would be more than unlikely in the small rockets we are speaking of).

Flat cords also fold to a smaller space more easily.

Pardon the tech post!

Do they, in "reality"? I have always had the "gut feeling" that they did, but have never sat down and proved it "mathematically".

I didn't even prove it mathematically, but a few years back I thought it would be cool to use a cord instead, and I shockingly found I could NOT fit the same length in the body tube I was used to using for flat. it did fit at all , yikes !

But, some might say you don't need to use as much cord as you do web, but that's another question.

Jerry, do you know ?

I find the length is more connected with component inertia. While there are non-elastic advocates among us, I feel elastic with a nylon line inhibitor at the 1/3-1/2 stretch length is "optimal.

YMMV.

Jerry

Flat cords can be folded or rolled with virtually no "holes". Round cord can be packed, but will still have gaps.

Bob Kaplow NAR # 18L >>> To reply, there's no internet on Mars (yet)!