What do you think would have happened if they had been allowed to attack NVPAF airfields? It's all pure speculation.
IMO so long as there's *any* possibility of a close-in engagement our fighters need to be armed with a gun. Rememer the A-10 jocks that tried to shoot down helicopters with missiles during the first Gulf War?
Would a JSF manage as well in tests like the Sea Harriers did against a top US aggressor squadron ?
Yes - I'll agree with that...and an SRM. But given current trends in tech and politics we're now back to what the AIM-54 was all about.
Limited only by our ability to ID what we're shooting at, which was/is always the problem...and where the politics come in.
...and from what I hear, shooting down helos A/A is a particularly difficult task anyway.
I would expect so and then some, or noone would be wanting it built in the first place...just given the improvements in weapons alone - having a things like AIM-9X or ASRAAM and a heads-up cuing system for example. Not to mention a better radar, and presumably a higher thrust to weight ratio.
Only problem is gathering the funding and justification to build them...
PolyTech Forum website is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here. All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.