confused about Sherman variants

Hello, I would like to purchase a 1/72 Sherman tank for a Normandy hedgerow diorama project that I have in mind. I normally build aircraft, so I'm not familiar with armor variants. Which version of the Sherman would be correct for July 1944 in Normandy (with a Cullin cutter mounted to the front)? Additionally, which kit would be the best bet to represent that version of the Sherman? Finally, are 1/72 Cullin hedgerow cutters available as a conversion kit, etc?

Reply to
Pauli G
Loading thread data ...

Pauli G avait prétendu :

formatting link
(in French)

Reply to
Flying Frog

The main ones in that time frame were the M4 and M4A1, 75mm early hull, orM4A1 76mm lte hull types, so anyone is okay. Note that the 76mm versions had the hip ring (round with split hatches) for the loader and not the small oval hatch and no muzzle brake.

There are about 10 different types of hedgerow cutters, the ones from

3AD being the ones refered to as "Douglas pattern" after the warrant officer who developed them. They have two large wedges on the ends and a bar with one or two teeth in the middle. They were also painted black over OD.

Cookie Sewell

Reply to
AMPSOne

So does that mean the Revell kit is ok to use? i have the Cromwell from Revell too. with the hedge cutter.

Reply to
Julian 'Penny for the guy' Hales

I'm curious, which had the most variants? The Messerschmitt BF-109 or the Sherman Tank?

:-) Bill Shuey

Reply to
William H. Shuey

The Revell kit from what I recall is an A1 so it should be fine.

Bill, there were only six basic Sherman variants (M4, M4A1, M4A2, M4A3, M4A4,and M4A6);d four of them were upgraded to new hulls, three to wider tracks and twin road wheels, as well as four different guns over the course of the run (M2 and M3 75mm guns, M1 series 76mm guns, and a

105mm howitzer.

Overall, the Bf-109 probably wins but it would be close.

Cookie Sewell.

Reply to
AMPSOne

I guess it depends on what you consider "variants". I don't recall the Bf-109's as having a whole family of "recovery vehicles", etc... ...nor did the Israelis develop a whole series of upgunned ones, either.

:o)

Reply to
Greg Heilers

I believe the Revell Sherman, although it has an M4A1 hull, has the horizontal volute suspension. That might make it post-D-Day.

Reply to
Alexander Arnakis

I think by the time they got some 'real' planes they were happy to dump the Avia S.199s.

Bill Banaszak, MFE

Reply to
Mad Modeller

Greg Heilers wrote in news:2Mrne.4857 $ snipped-for-privacy@newsread2.news.pas.earthlink.net:

How about a M7 105mm gun carriage? Or 2 basic tank destroyers M-10 & M-36. And the various versions thereof, on the basic M4 chassis.

Frank

Reply to
Gray Ghost

Alexander Arnakis wrote in news: snipped-for-privacy@4ax.com:

Nope the Hase is an M4A3E8. The Revell is an M4A1 76(W).

Reply to
Gray Ghost

Satiracal question: Did the Israelis use the M7 Priest? And if so, did the call them Rabbis?

:o)

Reply to
Greg Heilers

Greg Heilers wrote in news:Yfwne.5022$ snipped-for-privacy@newsread2.news.pas.earthlink.net:

@newsread2.news.pas.earthlink.net:

be fine.

M4A1, M4A2,

hulls,

four

75mm guns, M1

don't recall

vehicles", etc...

upgunned ones,

destroyers M-10 &

chassis.

And if so,

Yes and they removed the muzzlebrake, too. Oy!

Frank

Reply to
Gray Ghost

grey snipped-for-privacy@yahoo.com (Gray Ghost) wrote in news:Xns9669DDADD7154Wereofftoseethewizrd@216.196.97.136:

That's one STRONG mohel!

Reply to
CortxVortx

PolyTech Forum website is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here. All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.