Lately I've been buying kits from the late '60s & early '70s tha I
built as a kid, mostly for the boxes, but I'll probably build many of
them again. I just got 2 Monogram kits, same kit #, latest date on both
boxes is 1973. One box is smaller than the other & the photos on the
sides & ends are the same on both boxes but the boxtop photo is
different from the other. Anyone know the scoop on them switching
boxes? I would think they'd all be the same for the entire run.
sometimes they got better art, sometimes it was bait and
switch to make you think new kit. sometimes there was no
reason at all. i like those monogram boxes, too. when i have
a permanent home, my model room will have boxtop walls.
once i learn to make them fire retardent.
In 1973, Monogram switched to a new box art design for virtually all of
their existing line of aircraft kits. The light blue bordered box with
a painting of the subject aircraft were replaced by an all white box
with just a (rather sterile) photo of the assembled kit. One of the
first new Monogram kits released with this new box art format was the
P-82 Twin Mustang which included a photo of the assembled kit on a
"base" (dirt as I recall). The following year, 1974, is when Monogram
started including diorama construction brochures by Shep Paine with
their aircraft kits. The boxes also started featuring better bases and
backgrounds in the assembled kit photos on the box top. The Dornier
Do335 and the P-61 Black Widow were examples of this. Curiously, the
TBD Devestator didn't feature a base on the box even though it was
released around the same time as the P-61. By the time 1975 rolled
around, Monogram finally went back to featuring a painting of the
aircraft kit subject on the box top with it's 1/48 B-17G, although
smaller kits still featured a photo of the assembled kit. The reason
given for switching to using photos of assembled kits was a "truth in
advertising" hysteria. Revell also switched to using box top photos of
assembled kits around 1973 on most, but not all, of their aircraft
kits. For example, the 1973 release of the 1/144 cutaway L-1011
Tristar featured a painting of the kit while the 1/32 AV-8A Harrier,
released at the same time, featured a photo of the assembled kit.
Personally, I prefer a dramatic painting to a photo of the assembled
kit. I think if it wasn't for paintings on the kit box, Aurora would
have gone out of business long before it eventually did ;^)
Martin
Interesting. Are they both obviously the same individual model or are
they different individuals? Do they both have the hunter and dead
cougar posing for a photo? If not, perhaps someone complained that
Johnny was being influenced to kill 'helpless' animals. I've heard that
boxart took a hit when people complained about explosions and gunfire
showing in the illustrations. Pictures could be changed out faster,
cheaper and had none of that nastiness.
Bill Banaszak, MFE
I have the P-51D Detroit Miss and it has the same box art but different size
box. One question for you. Does one box have the Mattel Logo and one
doesn't?
Cheers,
Max Bryant
PolyTech Forum website is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here.
All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.