Xtrakit Meteor F8 - first look

Today I received a number of kits of the new Xtrakit 1/72 Meteor F8. This
is a version of the forthcoming MPM kit, specially boxed for Hannants.
Let me start with a niggle. I don't like the box! It's the standard box that
all MPM/Special Hobby kits come in and is very similar to the current style
of Revell boxes. Instead of having a separate lid, it opens a flap at the
side. Therefore you can't store the sprues and part made model in the box.
It's not really a problem.
The kit is comprised of 77 parts in a grey plastic, with six transparent
parts. Not all of these parts will be used. There are alternative intakes -
wide and narrow - as well as two canopies. For some reason, the box claims
that there are resin parts. There aren't!
The parts have nicely engraved panel lines. Some of the smaller parts appear
slightly "soft" but that's typical with MPM kits. There are a number of
ejection pin marks, but careful design has placed these where they won't be
seen. Cursory application of a ruler shows the main dimensions to be spot
on. I have temporarily taped the main components together, and the model
certainly captures the look of a Meteor.
The cockpit is quite detailed. It is comprised of 11 parts, which include
sidewall, side consoles, control column and pilot's leg rests. The
instrument panel has raised detail and appears to be accurate. The seat is
another matter. It has three parts, main beam/drogue container, seat unit
and parachute/seat back. Sadly there is no detail at all on these parts and
the seat will need a lot of work to bring it up to the standard of the rest
of the cockpit. It's probably best replaced with an aftermarket resin seat.
The cockpit floor doubles as the roof of the nose gear bay. The bay is quite
bare, but given the small size of the opening, I have to wonder how much
detail would be seen in here.
The instructions recommend 3g of ballast be placed in the nose. I think this
is a bit on the optimistic side, given the moment arm of that long tail.
Certainly my taped together build is a resolute tail sitter, even with three
3/16in nuts blu-tacked into the nose. I'd recommend packing the nose with as
many lead fishing weights as possible.
The wing assembly comes in two main parts - upper and lower. Into this are
fitted the undercarriage bays and the engine details. The bays have a
certain amount of structural details but they would benefit from further
plumbing being added. The engine details at first glance look odd. There is
a bulkhead with a representation of the leading edge passing across it. The
bulkhead has some details on it but not the turbine face that I was
expecting. However, a photo in Bryan Philpott's book "Meteor" shows this to
be perfectly correct. There are two alternative styles of intakes and there
are separate exhaust units - these *do* have turbine detail. The wings have
no facility for drooped flaps or airbrakes (the airbrakes are nicely
engraved). However, this isn't a problem. In all the pictures I've seen in
the two books I've consulted, not one shows a parked aircraft with flaps or
airbrakes deployed.
Each main undercarriage unit is comprised of six parts. There is some nice
hub detail on the wheels. The remainder of the parts are nicely formed but
lack detail - which is accurate. The real things were huge castings with no
subtlety whatsoever. There are sink marks on the main gear legs, but they
are not enough to compromise the integrity of the part and due to the lack
of detail should be easy to fill and clean up. The nose gear is composed of
four parts, with no sink marks. The undercarriage bay doors would benefit
from thinning and detailing on the inside.
There are two canopies included - an early metal framed one and a later full
view canopy. Both are moulded in one piece with no facility for displaying
them open. However, sawing off the windscreen will be an easy matter,
especially as the modeller can err on the side of caution, as there will be
a spare windscreen available. The transparencies are very thin and clear, so
I would advise extreme caution in that operation.
Stores are limited two underwing tanks and a belly tank. This is reasonable
as the only pictures I could find of F8s with underwing armament showed RAAF
aircraft in Korea.
The decal sheet and markings options present a problem. How do you choose
which one to build? The boxtop option is an aircraft of 501 Sqn RAuxAF. This
is camouflaged in Dark Green and Dark Sea Grey, with High Speed Silver
undersurfaces. The instruction sheet actually gives incorrect colours fr
this jet, but the mistake is rectified on an erratum sheet, which also tells
you which intakes are required for this scheme - the large ones.
The other schemes are both High Speed Silver (note *not* natural metal). One
is of a 600 Sqn RAuxAF jet with red and white squadron insignia on either
side of the fuselage roundel. The final scheme is quite spectacular. It is
of a 222 Sqn aircraft. It has WW2 style squadron code letters, but the
entire vertical tail is covered in red and blue checks. I have wanted to
build this scheme ever since I saw a colour profile of it in Scale Models
magazine back in the early 80s. Now I can! Both of these hets have the early
canopy and narrow intakes.
The decals themselves appear to be very thin. The carrier film is very
glossy indeed but is not extensive. The roundel colours look good - the red
is a nice dullish shade. There is a quite extensive range of stencils,
especially for the prominent wing walkways. Register is good, except for the
squadron commander's pennants for the 222 Sqn jet. It's quite odd, but I
have never seen these pennants in register on *any* decal sheet. A similar
thing occurs with the West German flags on the fin of modern Luftwaffe
aircraft. It simply isn't a problem though. Two strokes of a sharp knife
will put everything to rights.
I like this kit! I have two weeks before I have to dash off to university
for a month and so I was looking for something relatively quick to build
(seeing as I've just cleared my workbench). I think this kit will fit the
bill.
There is a lot of scope for this kit. If you don't like the markings
options, Xtradecal produce a set with no less than 18 other options. To be
honest with you, I feel quite victimised. I tend to get obsessed by markings
variations and this kit therefore seems to be targeted right between my
eyes. The potential for international colour schemes is simply huge!
MPM will also be releasing their own boxing of this kit. However, that seems
to be about £5 more expensive than the Hannants boxing. I wonder if that
will have an impact on sales.
I'm a little puzzled about the possibility of other variants. MPM have
announced an FR9. This would require some surgery on the parts as the F8
nosecone is moulded integrally with the fuselage. Another fuselage moulding
to take the differences into account would require a complete new A sprue.
It's more likely that we'll get a new nose as a transparency , with
instructions to chop the kit nose off at the relevant panel line.
Other versions, such as the trainers or nightfighters, would require new A
and B sprues - in effect a complete new kit. But who knows what may happen?
I'd certainly be interested in a kit of the nightfighter variants. I have an
old Matchbox kit in my Deep Stash so I'll probably experiment with grafting
the nose and outer wings onto this kit. Whatever happens, I can see myself
building a number of these Meteor kits.
So. what's next from MPM? May I suggest a series of English Electric
Lightnings?
Reply to
Enzo Matrix
Loading thread data ...
The build is proceeding. One thing I noticed is that there are very few locating pins. The fuselage halves have two - one at the extreme nose and the other at the extreme tail. It's a good idea to provide some plastic card ledges along the length of the fuselage.
Three grammes is *totally* unrealistic. I finally got the taped together assembly to sit correctly, but only after I had blu-tacked *six* nuts into the nose. The problem was that the nuts took up the space which would be occupied by the cockpit and gear bay.
I settled for using No 12 grade lead shot (very tiny). The extreme nose in front of the cockpit and immediately behind the gear bay is packed with the stuff. I've completed the main assembly and the model was *still* a tail sitter. The cockpit assembly has a rear deck. I thought there may be complications with the weight and so I left the decking off. This gives access to the area behind the cockpit, in which I have placed *more* lead shot. I've finally got the model to sit correctly, although I think the sit is marginal. I'll leave the deck off until the model is almost complete, so that I can add extra weight if necessary. So far there is about 15g of lead shot in the nose - five times the recommended amount. I hope the undercarriage can handle it!
I'm very pleased with this aspect of the kit. It's very convincing.
I'm well into the build and nothing has happened to make me change my mind. OK, there are various issues with the nose ballast, but nothing that is insurmountable.
So... I secured the lead shot in the fuselage halves with PVA glue. I was applying the glue sparingly from the tube. The glue flowed quite well and then stopped. So I squeezed the tube a bit harder. Nothing... so I squeezed it harder still... Eventually, there was a loud farting noise and what seemed like half a pint of PVA glue filled the fuselage half!
It was easily cleaned up, but I think I'm in the running for this month's Dumbass Award! :-D
Reply to
Enzo Matrix
There are also the engines behind the bulkheads (but ahead of the wheel mounts) and the forward part of the belly tank (if you intend to use it) where a bit more weight can be placed.
Reply to
Jessie C
Just a word about the decals. They are *incredibly* thin. You won't need to use any sort of decal solution with them. They were straight into the panel lines like a rat up a drainpipe. Just be a bit careful once they are on the model. The glue is very strong and so you'll need to use a fair bit of water to keep them moveable. Once they're bedded down, if you try to move them without the benefit of water, they'll tear.
As the decals are so thin, I wondered about the opacity. My chosen scheme is silver, so any translucency won't be a problem. However, I applied one of the spare roundel and squadron marking decals to a camouflaged paint dummy. The white in the decals is nicely opaque and I don't think there'll be any problems with base colour bleeding through.
This is a quite exceptional decal sheet.
Reply to
Enzo Matrix

Site Timeline

PolyTech Forum website is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here. All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.