matts blog ( again) 14 Feb - destined for Walmart

I see matt is having a wee rave on his blog again about SW development. I thought I should counter this just for balance and to stimulate thought. Not that we ever get much of a discussion going about these things here.

Some time ago when I posted to this group more often I suggested that SW could be picking up game technology for use in CAD. At that time SW had achieved quite a lot with the product and was facing uncertainty about where to go next. It was apparent that the largest innovation in 3d was being done in other graphics sectors. To my mind there is no reason why this borrowing should not take place provided the look and feel is tailored for technical use. I suggested that there was no good reason why a digital calculator should look like an abacus and no fixed requirement why CAD should remain rooted in AutoCAD type icon swatches I have also made other suggestions including emerging technology like MS SeaDragon in CAD which many people would find even more incongruous. Indeed extrapolating this notion you could actually completely re arrange the engineering mindset to be more about information exploration and refinement than carefully controlled sequential projects executed by specialists Far from being junk crammed in to a CAD program I see it may well be that the junk is going to be the real tool and that CAD is only going to be a sub module of it We will be taking advantage of automation not only to take the donkey work out of projects but to make them self propagating and adjusting. I see CAD as such to be less important in the future of design than traditionalists would like In fact I am going to throw in a new idea and state that the next pursuit should be a move to a more holistic approach where the design process is replaced by a readily re-orderable database of information, images and even sound and where drawings become largely museum pieces I think the real items destined for the bargain bin are the people and businesses who don't reach forward with an open mind as to what part technology can play in their endeavours

have a nice day all

Reply to
neil
Loading thread data ...

Sounds a lot like SolidWorks does already--or if you want easier to use interfacing, add in say Driveworks and a decent PLM or PDM package.

After all, it is a model driven environment already, the database ability is there with or without an addin, (toolbox for an example) and if you want you can add images and sound into the Design Binder.

Just needs a fancy GUI and you have what you mention, no?

It might be possible for the GUI to happen without SolidWorks being changed at all, and simply hook the GUI and file accesses portion into SolidWorks from Vista.

All in all the biggest hold backs to drawingless design is third party vendors and customer wants for documentation.

--Matt

Reply to
Matt Schroeder

now that they have arrived perhaps they can restate the tools to work in a more useful way - rather than have paths to specific detail with CAD at the centre perhaps something like SeaDragon can take us in to the creative engineering process or interrogate it through multiple entry points so rather than being presented with a 'blank screen' ( I am sure he didn't actually mean that cos its very funny) we are actually in need of a portal to an engineering mindmap - that is ,not 'blank' but 'open' to the users definition depending on who you are the information is presented to suit your requirements in this way the interface can appear as a particular discipline prefers it and provide an on the fly translation service. hmmm...food for thought anyway

Reply to
neil

It wouldn't surprise me if this was something they might implement but not without catching hell from the general base of users. We all know how interface changes seem to bring out the squeeky wheels. It's a tough row to hoe for SW who no doubt knows they have to progress in overall look and feel and keep modern and applicable yet limit the pain to users who have a different agenda--namely producing designs.

--Matt

Reply to
Matt Schroeder

PolyTech Forum website is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here. All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.