Group
Well, I built my dual Opteron system.
MSI K8T Master2-FAR, MB
2x Opteron 246 2 gigs DDR Quadro 980XGLI haven't run any comparative SW benchmarks yet, but I did do some Mastercam tests that involved a very complex 3D toolpath. This measures pure CPU horsepower. The system I compared it against was a P4 3.2ghz, 1 gig ram, Quadro 580XGL. Both systems had the same MC configuration with regards to memory allocations to toolpaths etc.. Neither machine used more than 512mb of ram. Graphics had nothing to do with the results.
The P4 generated the toolpath in 40 seconds. The Opteron did the same path in 18 seconds. Now, before anyone gets too crazy, allot of this has to do with th P4's inefficiency in running pure x86 code. Heavy floating point tasks don't run well on the P4 unless the application is optimized for it. Mastercam isn't, but it impressed the hell outa me anyway.
I did do couple of quick SW rebuilds of the same monster model on the two machines. The Opteron still beat the P4. Not by 100% this time, closer to 25 or 30%.
A quick car analog. The P4 is like a Saab. Weeny little 4 banger turbo tortured just this side of failure.
The Opteron or Athlon64-FX are like a Mustang Cobra.
Both cars are fast, but the Mustang is faster. The torque monster V8 doesn't have to work nearly as hard, or spin as fast to get there either.
Regards
Mark