Re: Peeve of the Day - Shop related

[ Never made this claim. Got proof that I have said I'm an expert user ] -Jon Banquer - [ To Matt, SolidWorks 2007 Bible Author, an expert

"You don't have the broad based CADCAM background I have and so you're ignorant on how other CADCAM modelers work." ]-Jon Banquer-

[

After being repeatedly asked to put up as you offered instead you shut up Jon, why is that? You made it up you can't post any examples, real examples. ]-brewertr-

You made it up means you lied.

So, if it's not a lie then post people/companies with no mechanical engineers who designed their own engines, gearboxes, etc.

Tom

Folini stated it clearly when he posted:

[ UPDATE -- July 8, 2007 -- I had to close this blog post to further comments and to remove the personal attacks between Jon and some other newsgroups readers. Before the interview, I made an agreement with Jon about the style of the interview and the way to handle it. Jon didn't respect our agreement, posting comments under fake names. Jon's authentic and fake comments are all posted from the same IP address, 72.199.251.224. I can now see that my trust in Jon was misplaced. ]-Franco Folini-

And you refused to describe the type of work you were doing and EXACTLY what problems you were having with it. You never answered because to do so would expose you for what you are, a beginner and a fraud.

Exactly what bad decisions Jon?

To make this type of threat you need some credibility, Jon you have none.

Tom

You live in Chula Vista, CA not the city of San Diego.

This one you would have to prove to me.

So how did you end up an itinerant machinist living in cheep motels or off the good will of others while your wife was spending years in prison for Identity Theft and Fraud?

Tom

Funny little guy......LOL

EXACTLY WHAT LIES JON?

You seem to be heavy on the accusations and light on examples/proof.

OH! And while your at it post the names of places you say designed and built their own engines, gearboxes, etc. and don't have any mechanical engineers.

Tom

I heard jonnie even lied to that poor dog. He said he would trade a bowl of kibbles for just one lick of that dog's hairy balls. After jonnie got his lick in, he ran away with the kibbles for himself. Turns out it was all he had to eat that night under the highway culvert in Chula Vista.

Yes Jon, directly quoting you does make you look stupid.

Now it's correct, Brewer.

Ignorant:

=93Jon, I never forgot any of your postings about SDRC I made the wrong decision in spite of what you said. There have been a number of times that my Wife has told me to be careful in dealing with someone and after words says "I told you so". She earned the right to say it as well as you have earned the right to say I TOLD YOU SO. I made a decision that went against my better judgment and as usual it turned out poorly.=94 .... Tom Brewer

Ignorant:

=93I do not purchase programs unless I know before hand that they are what I want and/ or need.=94... Tom Brewer who can=92t follow his own advice. See above.

Ignorant:

Tom Brewer thinking he and his pals like Joe788 can play their Usenet staking games, lie on a repeated basis and suffer no consequences for doing so.

Ignorant:

=93I have shot myself in the foot, not an easy thing to do when it is in your mouth and your head is in your ass.=94=85 Tom Brewer admitting what he=92s often like.

Ignorant:

Someone who has a proven track record of not being able to deal with or accept the kind of change that occurs in the cadcam market... now that's ignorant or should we say that's Tom Brewer.

Ignorant:

Someone who doesn't live in San Diego yet insists there is no shortage of CNC machinists here... now that's ignorant or should we say that's Tom Brewer.

Ignorant:

Someone who criticizes someone on SolidWorks but has never helped anyone with specific SolidWorks answers. Someone who is not able to answer any questions that =93Vinny=94 had on master modeling or skeletal modeling. Someone who has never posted any models they have done... now that's ignorant or should we say that's Tom Brewer.

Ignorant:

Tom Brewer's failure to understand who Matt Lombard really is.

Ignorant:

Tom Brewer=92s unable to comprehend what=92s on the cover of the SolidWorks Bible:

"Whether you're a new, intermediate, ...."

Ignorant:

Someone who can=92t understand more than a simple =93I love it!=94 or =93I hate it!=94 type of comment ... now that's ignorant or should we say that's Tom Brewer.

Ignorant:

Tom Brewer implies that because you acknowledge that the $25 SolidWorks course covers subjects / topics that the $650 SolidWorks course didn't that you're now somehow an idiot and got screwed when you decided to purchase the $650 SolidWorks course.

Tom Brewer Writing About SmartCAM:

=93I ended up paying a consultant $40.00 per hour for two weeks.=94

=93FYI, when I said "Solid modeling" in reference to SmartCam it was tongue in cheek. What you could not see is that when I was typing that I was laughing to myself. Anyone that uses SmartCam and Solid Modeling in the same sentence cannot be taken seriously.=94

Recently Tom Brewer said SmartCAM had no user interface problems and yet the record shows Tom Brewer thinks SmartCAM does indeed have user interface problems:

=93The only real problem that I run into is that the screen can get cluttered and it becomes difficult to pick and choose elements in Free Form. I just use the utility masking feature to hide what is in the way, that cures the problem but it does add work (I tried the snap filtering and snap options but for me it was not the best way), I have seen other packages that handle picking and choosing in better.=94

Conclusion:

Tom Brewer thinks he=92s a SolidWorks expert. A SolidWorks expert is someone who knows more and more about less and less until he knows absolutely everything about nothing.

Jon Banquer San Diego, CA

I finally figured out why Jon won't respond with anything but a Peewee Herman-esque "I know you are but what am I..." forgery:

He'd rather look like a childish idiot, than expose himself as being clueless about CADCAM.

So, when anybody asks him a direct question and he doesn't want to answer it, he just misquotes and says "Now it's correct."

If he actually TRIED to answer the question, it would just prove that he's talking out of his ass. Like when he tried to claim he was "working with" HSMWorks, or that Gibbscam/Smartcam have no chaining, or that you can't chain the edge of a solid in Mastercam X2 without telling it what to select, or......you get the picture.

Because of his mental condition, he'd rather look like a childish lunatic than a fraud. Which ironically, just makes him look even more insane.

It is called wacking your Banquer, this sounds better than a metal condition. iQ