Coreless Motors

Could someone confirm that a "Coreless" motor simply lacks a yoke? If this is the case, is the purpose technical or commercial?

Regards

Reply to
Peter Abraham
Loading thread data ...

My understanding of the terminology is that the yoke holds the pole pieces together and is often part of the frame or casing, so the answer to your question is no.

In a "normal" motor, the armature windings are wound around a core which gives the armature greater momentum and thermal mass.

A coreless motor literally has no core. The armature is simply the windings. The lower mass means they can respond much more quickly to changes in voltage. The lower thermal mass is one reason they are said to be unhappy when fed too low a frequency of pulsed waveform.

Andrew

Reply to
google

Purpose is technical. They have very low interia, no cogging. They are the engineering choice for expensive (thousands to millions of pounds) precision instruments where such behaviour is required. They have some uses in model railway propulsion, if married to appropriate gearing.

Design. In most cases, the armature is just a wire basket, there is no central "core" to the motor. This is what gives it the low inertia. In some designs, the fixed magnet is placed within the centre of the basket. The winding basket design means there are no specific "poles", so the motor does not "cog".

Years ago, I edited a short work on making ones own motors, which covered "normal" and "coreless" designs. I might translate it for the internet sometime, though its value is only historical, as cheap quality small motors are available commercially.

- Nigel

Reply to
Nigel Cliffe

But as true background info that would be very valuable. Please let me be the first to encourage you to do this.

-- Rod

Reply to
Benny

I have a Wills (yes, Wills, not SEF ;-) ex-SECR H class kit that I built back in the late 80s, and it has a Portescap RG4 in it. When I run it (which is not very often at the moment) it is very smooth. I'm wondering how best to convert it to DCC though. What would be the motor settings on a Lenz Gold to best suit??

Reply to
Ian J.

General view is that the noiseless Lenz models are fine. I think that includes the Gold models.

Try asking the JMRI (Decoder Pro), or the DCCUK Yahoo group for opinions on best settings.

Reply to
Nigel Cliffe

It largely depends on the decoder output frequency. If the output frequency is 16kHz or more the decoder may be used for coreless micro motors.

Reply to
Erik Olsen DK

PolyTech Forum website is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here. All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.