The Claughton has definate possibilities, especially if Bachmann/Hornby
decide on another LMS engine, but don't want to replicate an existing one.
I'd rather see the Patriot, 3F and Royal Scot redone to the standards of the
8f.
No, EAR is metre gauge, one of the blockages in the Cape - Cairo
railway concept.
South Africa, Botswans, Zimbabwe, Zambia, Congo, Angola, Mozambique
formed a connected 3ft 6in system. Through the 50s and 60s EAR
equipment including the Garratts was purchased to be convertible to
3ft 6in in anticipation of a connection to the South eventually being
built. This connection was eventually built by the Chinese as the
TAZARA (Tanzania - Zambia Railway) but there is still a break of guage
in Dar-es Salaam and it seems unlikely the conversion will ever
happen.
Keith
"estarriol" wrote
Unlikely I'd have thought for two main reasons:-
a) Didn't really survive into the BR era (ok I know one just did, but it
was one of the ugly large boiler variety)
b) None in preservation.
A real potential for commercial failure in my opinion.
John.
Bachmann/Hornby
existing one.
standards of
How many Backmann A1's, J39's or K3 have you sold, on your reckoning
you should not have sold that many as non survived into
preservation...
Backmann must be about ready to call in the administrators on your
logic above!
":::Jerry::::" wrote
Sometimes Jerry I despair with your logic.
The widest modelled era in current railway modelling is the BR transitional
era. A1s, J39s and even K3s were extremely active during that time. Now
tell me how many Claughtons were around in the post-Modernisation Plan
period? Precisely NONE!
John.
reckoning
transitional
time. Now
Yes, and nor did I say that you should have sold none. My point was,
none of the loco classes I listed survived into preservation yet all
are advalible as RTR models, if preservation is not relevant for the
loco's you want to be available as RTR models then why do you think
it is relevant for those that you don't want to see?
I sometimes despair with your (thinly disguised) blatant bias against
what you personally don't like...
":::Jerry::::" wrote
Oh right - and are we not afflicted in that way to some extent or other?
I don't particularly like most GWR prototypes, and they don't sell
particularly well in Hull, but I acknowledge that there's a big market for
all things GWR, and I think I expressed a thought not so long ago that some
of the outside framed 4-4-0s might sell rather well. I'm also at one with
Jane Sullivan in thinking there might be some mileage in the big GWR
8-coupled tanks
I seem to recall suggesting sometime in the past that Adams Radials and
Beattie Well tanks of Southern vintage might have some potential too.
I also acknowledge that there's only a very small market for
pre-nationalisation models, including the 'Claughton' which just happens to
be one of my all time favourite locos. Despite that I wouldn't risk my cash
on producing a ready-to-run version of this loco, and consequently wouldn't
lobby any of the RTR manufacturers to do the same.
John.
Jerry - I think you'll find that, to the majority of railway enthusiasts and
to the thousands of commuters who crawled off main line trains at Waterloo,
"the Drain" was the Waterloo and City line. If I recall (reasonably)
accurately, the stock in use on this line up to (about) the mid-1990's was
of ex-Southern Railway origin; the ventilators above the end doors on each
coach had a grille cut to read "Southern".
Hope this is a meaningful contribution,
David Costigan
risk my cash
But you then suggest in the same breath that the Adams Radials and
Beattie Well tanks would be, I can think of one reason why someone
like Bachmann or Hornby might just be prepared to produce a
Claughton - namely that they almost certainly already have a chassis
for it [1], unlike the other two!
[1] remember the history of the Claughton's, I haven't compared the
wheel base of the class against that of the Patriot's but I doubt
they are a million mile apart...
Opposite problem with the P1's, it seems. The trains they could
pull were too long for the infrastructure to deal with, even after
their booster engines (on the Cartazzi axle) were removed.
Cheers,
Francis K.
I tends to suggest that slang is local, and the same slang-term can
be in use in two places at the same time and meaning different things
(or in this case, underground railway lines)!...
Won't it be the case though that some locos are purchased just becuase
they're attractive to look at?
One of Pat Hammond's books mentions that Tri-ang found that blue locos
would sell better than anything else.
And now they're bringing back "Lord of the Isles" - I suspect many
sales will be made just because it's pretty, not because the buyers
happen to model the relevant region/period.
Just a thought anyway!
after
No, the V2 were intended for express goods, not plodding along at
under 40mph (or what ever the limit was for unfitted 9ft RCH wagons
at the time.
Anyway the P1's lasted another 9 years after the first Gresley V2 was
introduced.
I was surprised when Hornby introduced the GWR County 4-4-0s all those
years ago. A City or a Dukedog would have been better because the
Counties didn't last beyond the 1930s. Think of a "limited edition"
box with City of Truro and Duke of Connaught - that would have sold
more than a few.
":::Jerry::::" wrote
But it's all commercial judgement Jerry. I reckon both Adams Radials and
Beattie Well tanks would sell. Both were around in the BR transitional era,
both are represented in preservation and both had celebrity following to
some extent or other. I think either or both would have been a better
choice than a 'King Arthur' or yet *another* raft of 'Bulleid Pacifics'. As
it happens I think the M7 is quite a good choice of prototype to reproduce
as a model, even though it is not a particular favourite of mine.
The Claughton (or at least the small-boilered version) was a particularly
attractive loco, but with interest in the pre-nationalisation scene being on
the wane, I don't think it would sell in *enough* numbers to be commercially
viable. Maybe it's one of those locos that will continue to require you to
buiild a kit if you want an example - and there's nothing wrong with that.
I'd like one, but it's not a priority for me because I've no real modelling
interest in the pre-Modernisation Plan era, and I don't want one enough to
spend a considerable amount of time building a kit or scratchbuilding. I'd
also like a Hughes L&Y 4-6-0 but I suspect that would fall into the same
boat.
John.
"ab" wrote
Inevitably, which probably explains why I have a significant collection of
USA and German steam loco models, but it's only a factor in why locos sell.
The best selling steam loco in my shop in 2005 was the Bachmann Ivatt
2-6-0 - widely regarded as one of the ugliest steam locos of all time. This
despite the fact that it was *up against* the new Hornby A4s and A3 models,
and I'm in former LNER territory! The worst selling (recently new) model
was the Q1 0-6-0 so that helps negates any argument that ugly sells for ugly
sake!
John.
":::Jerry::::" wrote
Bit V"s did both fast and slow goods work, and at the same time released
other locos for slow freight work which presumably meant there was no need
for FURTHER P1s.
So what? They were supposedly good engines.
John.
Not being a GW modeller, I cant comment on the 8-coupled tanks (wern't
they only used in south wales mining areas?) but the outside framed
4-4-0's would definitely merit an appearance! I think everyone can
justify City of Truro, even if it is only hauling a railtour to the
north of scotland or Kent or wherever!
ISTR reading somewhere that OO Work had asked Hornby about their future
plans so as not to waste money developing a model which Margate would
produce the following year, and that is why they chose the Adams Radial
over the Beattie well tank. Perhaps 2007 will see a flurry of Bodmin and
Wenford based layouts?
I dont think anyone is going to be able to make a pre-group layout with
just RTR stuff, and a pre-nat one may well also need some kitbiulding
(unless its GWR!), but the biggest market IS the post
nationalisation/transition era and if an older loco survived until the
mid 50's in large enough numbers, there will be a commercial case for
producing it( and in a group or pre-group livery too).
I'd actually quite like to see the M7 produced in LSW livery - perhaps
for the Hornby collectors club?
PolyTech Forum website is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here.
All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.