I believe there were also operational difficulties, eg water colums in
pairs spaced for two 0-6-0s. The Garratt tank fillers were a different
distance apart.
"John Turner" wrote in message
SNIP
........and a 2-10-0 WD (as well as a 2-8-0 now available from Bachmann) and
a Standard Clan.
To be fair, his L&Y 0-4-0T dock shunter and J94 were better models than
anything else available at the time from Hornby.
I would definitely plan on buying a LM Garrett if one ever appeared in OO,
and I certainly have no room for 100 wagon trains!
Dave W.
Just in passing, I actually worked for the owners of Beyer Peacock a few
years ago. The legal entity still exists, but it is now a tax-pensions
investment vehicle for Arab interests. My job was dealing with some of the
statutory records, but I was continually distracted by the one remaining
tangible asset of the company that was located opposite my desk.
That asset was a 5" gauge model of a full Beyer Garratt. Magnificent.
But also a sad reminder of the fate that awaits all British industry.
Cheers,
Steve
No, it's because they *didn't* listen to me a couple of years back, and
wasted their time dabbling in Italian matters instead of getting on with a
Beattie well-tank. ;-)
Cheers,
Steve
that the
1925 - 1945
does say
You would also have read about the fact that those boilers were
relatively new (to them) when the loco's were withdrawn, there
original boilers having been scrapped in '42, for being in the worst
condition even seen for that type of boiler.
"The boilers were interchangeable with the A1
and A3 type boilers, but the P1s kept their
original boilers longer than any of the A1s. This
may explain the extremely bad condition of
No. 2393's boiler when it was removed in 1942.
The Works Manager described it as [italic] 'the
worst condition of any Pacific boiler I have ever
seen'.[/ intalic]> Both P2s had their original
boilers replaced with A3-type boilers in 1942."
The question still stands, if the P1's were so in efficient and
caused so many problems that some are claiming, why were they not
scrapped in the early '30's and the parts used to build new A3 etc. -
let alone a proposal for more to be built?
"The two P1 locomotives were initially put to work
hauling coal between New England and Ferme Park,
which was the only route which could usefully use their
haulage abilities. By 1926, they were still well thought
of, with the Locomotive Running Superintendents
recommending the replacement of four 0-8-0s with four
new P1s. However, these would never be built"
Always popular, I am still baffled why there are no RTR outside frame GWR
engines. The Dukedog always seems to come high on the wish lists, and it's
not as if the GWR itself is on the margins of popular interest! I had
wondered whether the ouside frames were an engineering headache, but the
recent 08s from Bachmann and Hornby would suggest that's not so much of a
problem.
Cheers,
Bill.
Oh yes indeed. It is an absolutely beautiful piece of machinery and a beautiful
model.
It also has a very pretty price tag attached to it - US$ 614.10. I could buy
several
56 class or 59 class with that sum.
Even though I've only very recently acquired an interest in railways outside
North
America, I have always had a fondness for Garretts. I think they are very
interesting
and very good-looking. The one in your link is especially so. I have been
interested
in Australian railways for about twelve years, but I don't want to say too much
about
them account this is a UK centered board, and I am trying to cultivate an
interest in
UK outline modeling.
Thanks for the link :-)
Forgot about those ;o) Actually, so is Victoria. When was bank a
Southern BR station? I've always thought that the Waterloo and City was
part of the underground network (I expect I'm wrong though, from a
historical perspective).
Apparently the line was bought by London Underground for one pound.
Before the time that it was in NSE livery, older readers will remember the
stock in green, and with SR logos.
Actually, I thought they lived south of the Thames, in places like China and
India! Or, do you mean the *UK* non-London population? This is an important
distinction, because Hornby source their products in China, and now have an
international distribution channel. There is actually more opportunity for
Hornby in the burgeoning Asian consumer market....
Well, using that logic, Liverpool must be a good place to build upscale
private health clubs...they've certainly got a big population, not many
clubs already, and the logic is equally valid...
In any case, logic based on population numbers doesn't enter into Hornby's
equations, or they would only be producing EMU's and nothing else. P1's
indeed!
Cheers,
Steve.
I think the "uk" refers to the place of operation of the prototypes of the
models, not the geographical location of modellers!
Otherwise, what are we to make of a question from a subscriber in the USA
about a model made in China of a prototype built in Romania?
The class 56's operated in the UK for a while, so I'm told. I never actually
saw one myself. They have the same significance to me as a P1. But I *have*
seen, and travelled on, green trains at Bank station. Which had, I may add,
a longer lifespan than the class 56. And were used by a somewhat larger
number of people than the Blue Pullman.
So when are Hornby planning to release a model of "Drain" stock? Before the
Claughton, I hope!
Cheers,
Steve
PolyTech Forum website is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here.
All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.