Peco Point Problems.

My more modern Points which have no support under the operating tie bar at the outer sections have been giving problems with poor contact electrically and more recently dropping the blade sufficiently to allow wheel sets to drop off the outer rail (this is always manifested on the curved blade rail.

The blade is set some 40 thou above the sleeper surface so I have been experimenting with various arrangements and materials to overcome the problem.

The result was 40 thou PVC strip, cut to the width of a sleeper and

18mm long ( just sufficient to sit under both blades when aligned with the nearest sleeper to the under side contacts and held in position with a spot of super glue). Silicon oil applied between the sleeper and the new tie bar ensures freedom of movement coupled with sufficient strength to support the blades under load.

I have discovered the ultimate test vehicle -- it will object to the slightest imperfection or sample of shoddy work or poor design -- the Mainline Class 45 peak!

Has anyone else had this experience with their points ? My older peco units which have a built in longitudinal tie under the extremes of the operating tie bar do not suffer like this.

Regards

Reply to
Peter Abraham
Loading thread data ...

Yes I have just discovered the same thing when I was laying my layout and testing each section in turn. There was an electrical gap on the movable rail . Unfortunately I was testing using a 4 coupled steam loco so both wheels were in the gap. Tried rigging up temporary power to this section but still no good. Never thought the rail may have dropped as well thereby no contact possibly being made. I just replaced the point. I did think the throw of the underboard motor was insufficient but that was not the case.

Have decided to put tender pick ups on any 4 coupled locos I might have.

Will test out your suggestion and see if it works

John

Reply to
John Firth

"Peter Abraham" wrote

Hi Peter,

I've passed your comments on to Peco; it will be interesting to see what response is received.

Best wishes, John,

53A Models, Hull.
Reply to
John Turner

"Peter Abraham" wrote

Did Peco sort this issue for you Peter?

John.

Reply to
John Turner

Not necessarily, it could mean that nobody is reading the thread (unfortunate, but it happens), or that those who are reading don't use Peco points (eg. me).

- Nigel

Reply to
Nigel Cliffe

PolyTech Forum website is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here. All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.