Then someone in the club shows you that beautiful little N gauge loco he has
just purchased and you think "Now if I just bit the bullet and changed gauge
what a layout I could fit in the space then...."
Been there, done that.
Manxcat
It took me 3 years to lay the track, rip it up, relay it, ballast and paint,
rip it up, relay it, ballast and paint.
Now 3 years later it recently occured how by minor re-arrange of funiture
can extend outer loop to offset figure of 8 with fiddle yard whilst
maintaing the current level of fidelity to the prototype.
Also about to get some quotes on loft conversion.
I recon if you stop moving then you'll get decorated with ornaments.
Cheers,
Simon
In message , john
dolan writes
It is neither a double nor a single slip, but is just two points
overlapped a bit. It looks a bit like a double slip with one of the
straight roads missing.
In south Wales coal sidings you used to get a whole string of them on a
diagonal line going across a group of parallel sidings.
Indeed we will, by mid December we'll have about 5 hours of daylight.
However, come June we'll have 19 hours of daylight (the "Simmer Dim");
quite disconcerting to go to the bathroom at 3 am and find that it's
broad daylight.
On 29/09/2007 22:29, john dolan said,
No, its actually very simple! It's just two turnouts overlapped "back
to back". I imagine Colonel Stephens used one because it could be made
up from standard P&C parts, and likewise those of us who build our own
track could knock one out far quicker than a normal slip.
I would hazard a guess that it might even be possible to make one using
two Peco turnouts, although I haven't done this.
beamendsltd said the following on 01/10/2007 10:57:
Just bear in mind it doesn't have the same functionality as a double
slip :-)
Oh yeah, they're easy to do in Templot!!
I've just incorporayed one in my latest small S scale layout and it
really does help out in space saving in certain conditions.
I can just hear the 'Not another layout with a Barry slip" comments in
a year or two's time :-)
Jim.
Yes, I noticed - but using one of theose actually makes good
sense (not least as I've got make it) replacing a single slip
I have had to add completely un-prototypically (duplicate routes
on adacent sets of points). I even had two points superimosed last
night for a solution, but ruled it out on as being unprototypical
- et voila, it isn't!
As is everything in Templot when you've driven it enough, but
by 'eck the learing curve can be a bit steep! I just hope
"automatic" three way points don't get added to Templot before
I actually get the track glued down.......
Richard
LOL! I've spent 3 years armchair modelling with XtrkCad, *and* changed
scales having already started buying stock and kits for my initial
choice, to try and avoid going through that. I sometimes wish I'd just
chucked some track down on a few baseboards and suffered the pain that
Chris describes.
My recent mantra has been "less is more". Minimal track density in a
large space in N giving the impression of the railway flowing through
the landscape (this started after a visit to Pendon). I saw the BRM
article about Kings-X in N a few weels ago. Now I'm undecided again.
I'm beginning to think I need at least three layouts. One small shelf
layout I can get built and running in a short time, one high density
computer controlled where I can just watch trains whizzing hither and
thither and the "less is more". Then there's the O or OO layout so I
can fulfill my fantasy of highly detailed finescale etched brass
models. Oh that's 4, Aaaaggghhhhh.
MBQ
PolyTech Forum website is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here.
All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.