Friction Stir Welding Done on a Home Mill

Nov 01, 2026 Last reply: 3 days ago 4 Replies
Jump to replies (4)

Stir welding usually lives behind factory doors, with heavy rigid machines and purpose-built rigs doing the work. Here AvE is on a second attempt at doing it at home, using shop-made tooling held in the spindle of a vertical milling machine and working a thick slab of aluminum. Compared with the usual way of running this process, that is a refreshingly modest setup for something that normally demands serious rigidity and force.



The build itself is pleasingly hands-on. A custom-machined pin gets held in a lathe chuck, and the maker sharpens and polishes the pin profile while the chuck turns, using a handheld power drill for the job. The finished tool then goes into the mill spindle. For the first test, two aluminum strips get clamped flat on the table, and the spinning pin works the seam between them, generating frictional heat. That initial butt-joint clamping fails. Afterward the maker moves to a stacked lap joint held down with four toe clamps, runs the pin through the upper sheet, and stirs aluminum that behaves like a molten mush. A second lap pass follows once the pulley ratio has been changed.



What stands out to me is the weld track, which shows concentric circular swirl patterns inside it, a satisfying sign of genuine stirring, and the stacked sheets do end up joined, with plenty of aluminum squeezed out along the way.



The trade-off sits in the results: the plates come out heavily distorted, pushed upwards, and covered in flash. Pin shoulder geometry, belt pulley speeds, and aluminum building up on the tool all clearly needed attention, and whether a cleaner pass is reachable on this kind of machine still looks like an open question.



Project by AvE. Watch it on their YouTube channel:

formatting link


Going from the failed butt joint to a stacked lap joint held by four toe clamps strikes me as the smart move in this build. A lap gives the pin more material to travel through, and the toe clamps spread the holding force along the strips instead of relying on edge grip. The trade-off is all that expelled aluminum and the flash left behind, but for a home rig that seems a fair price for sheets that actually join.

I have a question about the speeds. When the maker changed the pulley ratio before the second lap pass on the overlapped strip, did the new setting run the pin faster or slower, and did it show up in the swirl pattern or in how much aluminum got thrown out? I keep wondering which way the belt needed to go to calm the process down.

The maker has not said which direction the pulley ratio went, and no numbers for the belt speeds have been given. What is known is that belt pulley speeds were one of the issues addressed along the way, and that the second lap pass on the overlapped strip came after the ratio was changed. Beyond that, the exact setting has not been stated.

For a next round, I would suggest spacing more clamping points along the stacked joint than the four toe clamps used this time. The plates came out heavily distorted and displaced upwards, and tighter clamp spacing seems like it would hold the sheets down against that lift and trim back some of the flash. It would also make comparing passes easier, since distortion would vary less from run to run.

Join the Discussion

Have something to add? Share your thoughts — no account required.

Didn't find your answer?

Ask the community — no account required