I'm not sure why I picked MIG as the first welder I would buy. Might have been the illusion that I could get into it for $100 and move up from there. [I'm over that.]
I've looked into going to classes, which I'm sure would be the best option if I could do it. But I have a bit of a disability that only allows me a few hours a day of activity. If I don't overdo those I get several more hours of 'sit-down' time where I can read and learn. So I decided to teach myself with the help of the internet and a pile of books.
Well- a few months later, I learned a little about MIG- decided on a Lincoln/Miller 140amp setup. . . . found some forums to read. . . bought a couple books. . .and started shopping for a good price-
Noted an offhand comment on one forum where a newbie was showing off his new MIG setup and an 'oldie' said 'now you need to get some O/A torches'.
The first book I'm reading is Finch's "Welder's Handbook". He makes no bones about it. in his opinion everyone who wants to weld should start out with O/A. His feeling is that it helps you understand the process because you are more in touch with the puddle.
So now as I look at O/A setups and think I could get a decent setup for about the same $550-600 as I'm getting ready to spend on MIG, I wonder if that isn't the way to go.
O/A has the advantage of being a cutting tool, and 'hot wrench', as well as heating metals to be formed. [and I just started reading Finch's chapter on brazing and soldering-- is O/A more flexible in the 'what you can join' department?]
MIG has the [apparent] advantage of being easy to learn. Since I'm in this as much for 'the journey' as anything else, a steeper learning curve is fine.
I'm leaning towards O/A now. Any pushes in one direction or the other?
Jim [For the googlers and to show off my spell checker; oxy-acetylene, acetylene ] Thanks, Jim