Taking into account the fact that the transmitter aerial is working against ground due to the reactance that your body imposes between tha transmitter and said ground, then adding radials would c*ck the thing up nicely. Radials are attached to an aerial which is going to be used at a suitable height and they will thus present the correct radiation resistance and the whole aerial system will work as planned. You wafting a transmitter around at a greater or lesser height above ground is not going to give a system which is of any use... it will almost certainly be worse than the currently used systems.
Now thats an interesting concept.... if it was even remotely correct ! Dipoles are used in preference to end fed aerials because they do actually *reduce* noise. A dipole (suitably fed) is a balanced aerial and as such it greatly reduces impulse and other types of interference. Radio hams living in electrically noisy urban areas usually put up balanced aerial systems in order to be able to work effectively and hear low strength signals.... the dipole is still a very simple and effective balanced aerial.
Well at least you got this bit right... there really is a loading coil.
I don't just want to single out your comments as being wrong. There are numerous other incorrect statements in this thread but I haven't time to pick them out and reply to each one so I am taking the easy option >:-)
Reg