doing what members do not want???

MOTION VII: Moved by A. Argenio (I) and seconded by G. Fitch (II) to add to Bylaws Article X a new Section 3 as follows: Any elected officer of the association is limited to serving in the same position to three consecutive full terms. After this third term the officer may not run again for the same elected position without standing down for at least one election cycle. After one cycle an individual may run again for a previously held position and be eligible to serve for another three consecutive full terms. In any election, if there is no qualified candidate* of record (as determined by the chair of the Nominating Committee) 30 days before the nomination process ends**, an incumbent officer who has served the maximum number of complete terms may then be considered for an additional term by being nominated, per normal procedures, for the position currently held. If elected, this officer must stand down after this one term unless there is no qualified nominee, as determined above, in a subsequent cycle. This term limitation is effective taking into consideration current elected officers=92 service. Any current elected officer has the option of serving an additional consecutive full term after adoption of these term limitations, if they have already served three consecutive full terms as of the date of the adoption of these term limitations.

*A qualified candidate is defined as someone who meets all the qualifications necessary to hold the office he or she is seeking including, but not limited to, Leader Member status.

**The end of the nomination process is defined as the last day when nominations will be accepted at AMA Headquarters for the current year elections.

Renumber all sections following the new Section 3.

MOTION passed: 8-Yes; 1-No (III). VP=92s for Districts IV, VI, VII and XI were not present.

A. Argenio will draft the necessary wording for a vote to go to Leader Members for ratification.

Argenio to work on the Standing Rules, Officers section, to bring it into accordance with these new term limits should they be ratified.

Reply to
sfrank69
Loading thread data ...

doing what voters/members may not want...????

doing what voters/members may not want... !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

please read this ballot close and look at the HIDDEN CONSEQUENCES !!\

doing what voters/members may not want...

doing what voters/members may not want...

doing what voters/members may not want...

Reply to
sfrank69

SNIP

Argenio to work on the Standing Rules, Officers section, to bring it into accordance with these new term limits should they be ratified.

I guess the kicker is: (as determined by the chair of the Nominating Committee) Be blunt Dr. Frank. I'm not politically astute. mk not a denigrator

Reply to
MJKolodziej

The AMA can deal with EC TERM LIMITS NOW... (as needed)

  1. The Nominations Committee can do so,,

  1. The General membership VOTE ( the ballot)

(can apply where needed TERM LIMITS)

  1. and appointments by the President can do so...

but for those that can not get it their way... through the above...

use TERM LIMITS

how the new EC members can deal with the seniority

of some .....

do not let the members decide via their vote

but limit their choices in advance....

think it over...

by limiting the choice

does the member have MORE or LESS choice

as to their representatives????

Reply to
sfrank69

PolyTech Forum website is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here. All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.