| Nope Time,
Out of curiousity, who are you disagreeing with?
| Laws of Conservation of Matter/Mass and Energy - None can be created or | destroyed but their forms may be changed. Energy is *not* added rather some | mass/matter is converted/changed to energy.
When you charge your battery, you're adding energy to it. Sure, you're not adding energy to the *universe*, but your *battery* will have more energy than it did before, and if you can ignore things like outgassing, it will have more mass than it did before, as energy has mass.
(Now, for a chemical reaction like you'll find in a battery, the difference in mass is miniscule, but it's there. For nuclear reactions such as in fusion, the difference in mass can be substantial, like one percent or so for some reactions.)
In any event, on some level, you don't have to convert energy to mass
-- energy IS mass, and mass IS energy. And however you look at it, energy *always* has mass, no matter what form it's in.
| The universe has a finite amount of energy/matter and that is a | constant no matter what happens to change the forms of | energy/matter.
You say `finite', but we don't even know if the Universe is finite. `Constant' may be a better term, and even that hasn't been proven (even as much as anything can be `proven') on a cosmological scale (though of course theories that involve the spotaneous creation of matter and energy aren't currently in high favor.)
Now, how can I bring this around and make it all relevant to this newsgroup again? :)
When Maynard flew his 11 lb plane across the Atlantic a few years ago, the total was roughly half plane and half fuel -- 5.5 lbs of each. He had fuel crammed in pretty much everywhere he could fit it. Keeping the CoG somewhat constant as the fuel was consumed was probably a
*major* consideration of the design of that plane.The plane took off at 11 lbs, and landed a bit over 5.5 lbs. One advantage that gas/glow engines still have over electrics. Now if we could just get similar energy densities ...