"Dean" wrote in message news: snipped-for-privacy@posting.google.com... | I bought a Super Sportster kit and then bought one already put | together from a guy in my club. The one I bought already assembled | was a horrible flying plane. It took each aileron being about about | 3/8" off level to get it to fly level but it was still very | "squirelly", for lack of a better word. It could have been the age as | it was fairly old, it could have been assembly, or it could have been | the plane. Either way, I did not like it.
There must have been something wrong with the construction of the pre-built SS you bought. The GP Super Sportster is one of the sweetest flying transition planes I've ever built, and I've built two of 'em. I admit, the second one came in WAAAAY heavy because I tried to get too fancy smoothing the turtle-deck. But if it hadn't been for that, it would have been a sweet flyer, too. You said you have a kit of the SS. You really should build it and give the design another try. You won't be sorry if you build it light, and give it only half the dihedral called for in the instructions. On my first one, I even sheeted the wing and painted the whole model, there was not so much as a scrap of moneykote on it. I also modified the empennage, I couldn't stand those "circus looking" rounded tailfeathers, so I gave it something a bit more squared off. I don't know if it is a common characteristic of the design, but on landing with that stubby, stiff wire gear, it seemed to be almost magnetically drawn to the runway. Not in a bad way, but more like impossible to bounce, at least in hte tail-dragger configuration.
Don't condemn the design just because you didn't like the way someone else built it. Put that kit together and FLY IT....you'll see! ;-P
FWIW, Kev