CNC Bridgeport with Heidenhein control

Feb 23, 2010 63 Replies

Nor is it something which I would intend to do. I don't know how long it has been since I have used a parallel port to talk to a printer. :-)

O.K. Someone would have to do the experiment, I guess.

Good.

O.K.

It depends on how many registers need to be preserved and re-loaded. The SPARC cpu has a lot more registers than the X86 family of processors -- but it also has multiple sets of registers, so a process switch *can* be fast -- until you get more active processes than you have sets of registers -- then you still need to save everything from a set so it can be reloaded for another process.

A graph of load average vs increasing number of processes is a very shallow graph up to a certain point (which varies with which model of SPARC is involved, as the number of register sets has been increasing through the years) but at a certain number of processes the curve becomes suddenly much steeper.

Enjoy, DoN.

Me, either. I'm thinking about cutting the plugs off of at least a

55 gallon drum of parallel printer cables to sell them for scrap copper. Of course there won't be much copper after they are run though a wire crusher to remove the insulation. It would barely fill a two gallon bucket. :(

I have a lot of 15 & 25 foot printer cables, and a lot have gold plating on the connector shells that caught the eye of the gullible who bought them.

There are cheap monochrome security monitors around. They are typically in 9" or 12", but I've seen 21 inch, as well. I have some aluminum cased composite monitors that were used as computer monitors, but I haven't used any in about 15 years.

Join the Discussion

Have something to add? Share your thoughts — no account required.

Didn't find your answer?

Ask the community — no account required