Very often initial designs are more complicated than necessary. I'm actually surprised at Ed's take on this. Mine is not a slur on chevy engineers per se. But it COULD be a slur on management who may not be listening to some of their engineers.
Bottom line is, you don't know, Ed don't know, and I don't know why s*it is the way it is in the Volt. You swing from the dick of the status quo, and I'm simply asking why has chevy foregone a much simpler strategy. You yap yap yap yap about ICE, motor sizes, s*it you basically know nothing about cuz you don't understand basic parallel circuits. When parallel circuitry (in the Volt's case) is one of the keys to its function. See below.
Mebbe there IS a good reason for the Volt complexity. But you haven't explained it, no one has. Mebbe in the new thread.
Yeah, but at $18K, and 2500#...... LOL AND at about the same net-mpg's as the Volt!!!!! You edit wonderfully....
Bonkers is touting whatever
GM spent billions pandering to assholes like you, not nec'ly solving hybrid engineering problems.
I've already outlined how you can MANUALLY accomplish all that the volt does. If there's a flaw, point it out. If not, please, finally, stfu.
And note one thing: the Pruis c et al DO need some highfalutin software et al to accomplish the ICE/battery "optimization" you mis-spoke about.
But the Volt does not operate this way: It simply runs the batteries to empty (actually it doesn't or isn't supposed to, but that's another story), and then simply switches over ICE/generator mode. What's so fukn complicated about that? What's so expensive?? What's so cutting edge?? It's an obvious common sense strategy -- the crux of which, dare I mention it again, is the diesel-electric locomotive.