Bank of Batteries ?

Jul 24, 2007 133 Replies

Since a vibrator typically utilizes more than one cell in series, I think someone asking such a thing would be quite correct, as one does not change only a single cell in devices where a battery of cells are used.

Are you really so utterly stupid as to think that you are not a prick, dipshit? Also, I am not "with" my sister. She is over 3000 miles away.

That would be strike three for you, dumbfuck.

As a result of your post, you IQ has fallen another ten points. Keep it up, and plant life will be more intelligent than your retarded ass.

Yet another clue that you are likely a very poor teacher.

You probably do not even know the difference between "data", and "information".

Even though it DOES get logged, both on computers not on a network (logged locally), as well as those on a network. Instead of a log book, it gets added to a "log file" Can you really be that far off the mark of the very industry you claim to be an instructor in? Do you really have such problems with accepted industry terms?

Do you make it up as you go along, old man?

Keerimany! You are a legend in your own mind!

Get over yourself, old man!

You missed your calling. You should be walking a big city street corner with a "repent now" sign on.

You seem a "big dope" of the obvious. Need to know what "big dope" means? Watch the film "All of Me".

While deporable, it's quite evident that sellers of cells pretty much know the buying public won't understand what a blister pack of "1.5V cells" is.

When you can pluck the reality from my hand, it will be time for you too actually have a clue, Asswipechunk.

Said the zero contribution, retarded yap dog that spends his time nipping at my heels.

Interesting. And that supplied the plate voltage of about 90V?

Absolute proof that the last place you belong is in a technical group.

Your post is spurious. My reply is the response to that, resulting in a clean signal to those with at least half a brain.

I never stated that it was a problem. I merely stated that it was incorrect, and that is a fact.

Except you missed the target.

My post is not spurious. I respond to spurious posts with a clean signal.

Try again.

Yes, but it would mean something completely different from what was intended. There's no need to get cross about it.

Hmm. Very interesting -- but not funny.

Leave it to the English to f*ck up the facts, and for the rest of the world to take over a hundred years to catch it.

My electronics instructor caught it, as does anyone with a grain of common sense.

I am quite sure that the pioneers of the industry full well knew the difference, and had they read dictionaries often enough, they would have insured that it be corrected.

I'll bet that Faraday and Galvani knew it.

Your contribution here is? (hint to newcomers to the engineering groups, his "contribution" is negative and always has been).

Dimbulb, you'll never change, or grow up.

Wow Peter! You tied a long-standing record. Dimmie posted eight responses to yours. Nice work! I'm still proud of seven, but you da man!

Pretty sad then, that the world cannot be educated on such a simple, easily understood premise.

In fact... I think your assertion is quite wrong.

Think "Crystal Radio".

formatting link

Sorry, but what was intended was what I just wrote. What was written carried no meaning at all.

I didn't like her tone. Got a problem with that?

Sure it is. Still fits too.

Join the Discussion

Have something to add? Share your thoughts — no account required.

Didn't find your answer?

Ask the community — no account required