messing with the power connection

where "your type" == people who have pointed out your arrogance over your ignorance

Whatever that means. Phil, you've totally lost it.

Keith, they would chew his sorry ass up, and spit it out on SED. :)

On Sun, 02 Mar 2008 21:59:58 -0500 Michael A. Terrell wrote: | snipped-for-privacy@ipal.net wrote: |> |> On Sun, 02 Mar 2008 20:08:08 -0500 Michael A. Terrell wrote: |> | krw wrote: |> |>

|> |> In article , phil-news- |> |> snipped-for-privacy@ipal.net says... |> |> > On Fri, 29 Feb 2008 19:00:47 -0500 krw wrote: |> |> > | In article , snipped-for-privacy@ipal.net |> |> > | says... |> |> |> |> > |> | One could do an in-USA secure web browser too, just don't get caught |> |> > |> | "exporting" it (laptop). Since the Internet is "free", the whole |> |> > |> | thing wend down in flames, silly stories about kids in their |> |> > |> | bedrooms or not. |> |> > |>

|> |> > |> Whatever. But it was not re-invented. It was re-implemented. |> |> > | |> |> > | To you intentionally compete in the Dimbulb competition, or do you |> |> > | come by it naturally? |> |> >

|> |> > Your response makes no sense. Do you not understand the difference between |> |> > invention and implementation? |> |>

|> |> Do you not understand the purpose of quotation marks? Do you not |> |> understand that you're an ass' behind? |> | |> | |> | They never do. :( |> |> I'm glad to see the two of you together. Now all I need to do is get |> the other 4 of your type from other newsgroups to job you, and you all |> will be together. | | | "To job" What is that, some kinky thing you enjoy doing?

Typo. Should be "to join".

On Mon, 3 Mar 2008 06:07:03 -0500 krw wrote: | In article , phil-news- | snipped-for-privacy@ipal.net says... |> On Sun, 02 Mar 2008 20:08:08 -0500 Michael A. Terrell wrote: |> | krw wrote: |> |> |> |> In article , phil-news- |> |> snipped-for-privacy@ipal.net says... |> |> > On Fri, 29 Feb 2008 19:00:47 -0500 krw wrote: |> |> > | In article , snipped-for-privacy@ipal.net |> |> > | says... |> |> |> |> > |> | One could do an in-USA secure web browser too, just don't get caught |> |> > |> | "exporting" it (laptop). Since the Internet is "free", the whole |> |> > |> | thing wend down in flames, silly stories about kids in their |> |> > |> | bedrooms or not. |> |> > |>

|> |> > |> Whatever. But it was not re-invented. It was re-implemented. |> |> > | |> |> > | To you intentionally compete in the Dimbulb competition, or do you |> |> > | come by it naturally? |> |> >

|> |> > Your response makes no sense. Do you not understand the difference between |> |> > invention and implementation? |> |> |> |> Do you not understand the purpose of quotation marks? Do you not |> |> understand that you're an ass' behind? |> | |> | |> | They never do. :( |> |> I'm glad to see the two of you together. | | 1000 miles isn't together. | |> Now all I need to do is get the other 4 of your type | | where "your type" == people who have pointed out your arrogance over | your ignorance

Sure, describe it as that. I call it "crab apples of usenet". These are the ones that choose to make personal attacks regarding accused errors but do not specifically address the supposed errors.

On Mon, 03 Mar 2008 09:09:55 -0500 Michael A. Terrell wrote: | krw wrote: |> |> In article , phil-news- |> snipped-for-privacy@ipal.net says... |> > On Sun, 02 Mar 2008 20:08:08 -0500 Michael A. Terrell wrote: |> > | krw wrote: |> > |>

|> > |> In article , phil-news- |> > |> snipped-for-privacy@ipal.net says... |> > |> > On Fri, 29 Feb 2008 19:00:47 -0500 krw wrote: |> > |> > | In article , snipped-for-privacy@ipal.net |> > |> > | says... |> > |> |> > |> > |> | One could do an in-USA secure web browser too, just don't get caught |> > |> > |> | "exporting" it (laptop). Since the Internet is "free", the whole |> > |> > |> | thing wend down in flames, silly stories about kids in their |> > |> > |> | bedrooms or not. |> > |> > |>

|> > |> > |> Whatever. But it was not re-invented. It was re-implemented. |> > |> > | |> > |> > | To you intentionally compete in the Dimbulb competition, or do you |> > |> > | come by it naturally? |> > |> >

|> > |> > Your response makes no sense. Do you not understand the difference between |> > |> > invention and implementation? |> > |>

|> > |> Do you not understand the purpose of quotation marks? Do you not |> > |> understand that you're an ass' behind? |> > | |> > | |> > | They never do. :( |> >

|> > I'm glad to see the two of you together. |> |> 1000 miles isn't together. |> |> > Now all I need to do is get the other 4 of your type |> |> where "your type" == people who have pointed out your arrogance over |> your ignorance |> |> > from other newsgroups to job you, and you all |> > will be together. |> |> Whatever that means. Phil, you've totally lost it. |> |> -- |> Keith | | | Keith, they would chew his sorry ass up, and spit it out on SED. :)

There's only about 6 of you I've seen on the whole Usenet.

On Mon, 3 Mar 2008 06:07:02 -0500 krw wrote: | In article , phil-news- | snipped-for-privacy@ipal.net says... |> On Sun, 2 Mar 2008 19:40:58 -0500 krw wrote: |> | In article , phil-news- |> | snipped-for-privacy@ipal.net says... |> |> On Fri, 29 Feb 2008 19:00:47 -0500 krw wrote: |> |> | In article , snipped-for-privacy@ipal.net |> |> | says... |> | |> |> |> | One could do an in-USA secure web browser too, just don't get caught |> |> |> | "exporting" it (laptop). Since the Internet is "free", the whole |> |> |> | thing wend down in flames, silly stories about kids in their |> |> |> | bedrooms or not. |> |> |> |> |> |> Whatever. But it was not re-invented. It was re-implemented. |> |> | |> |> | To you intentionally compete in the Dimbulb competition, or do you |> |> | come by it naturally? |> |> |> |> Your response makes no sense. Do you not understand the difference between |> |> invention and implementation? |> | |> | Do you not understand the purpose of quotation marks? Do you not |> | understand that you're an ass' behind? |> |> Of course I understand quotation marks. What do they have to do with |> invention vs. implementation? | | Good grief Gert! I thought you could at least figure that out, | after having it held right in front of your stupid face! Wow, | you're dense!

Really? You make up some concept about quotation marks and think it relates to invention vs. innovation, and just expect people to read your mind?

Then you've either lead a 'very' sheltered online life, or you're the biggest liar on usenet. Either way, you can't be trusted.

| snipped-for-privacy@ipal.net wrote: |> |> There's only about 6 of you I've seen on the whole Usenet. | | | Then you've either lead a 'very' sheltered online life, or you're the | biggest liar on usenet. Either way, you can't be trusted.

There may well be a lot more people on Usenet that act like idiots and make personal attacks on people whose post they dislike, and assert that there are errors without being specific in pointing them out, or don't understand the logic of a different context in which the post applies, but I don't read that many groups to have encountered that many of you. I do periodically have disagreements with many people. I win some and I lose some. But what I have with idiots like you just degenerates into a little spat because you guys don't really care to approach the facts and logic (afraid to lose?). All this experience you supposedly have means nothing to me anymore because I have no way to know if what you post fits within it, or if you are just mouthing off at someone because you don't like them or what they say.

That's it, resort to more of your personal attacks, troll.

No, I expect people here to be half-literate.

snipped-for-privacy@ipal.net

Crap, Phil! You oughta get your eyes checked. I only see one MikeT.

|> There's only about 6 of you I've seen on the whole Usenet. | | Crap, Phil! You oughta get your eyes checked. I only see one | MikeT.

The "you" is the general class of people that are acting like jerks. You ( snipped-for-privacy@att.bizzzzzzzzzz) are one of them. There's the bud guy here. The rest are in other newsgroups.

On Mon, 3 Mar 2008 20:22:01 -0500 krw wrote: | In article , phil-news- | snipped-for-privacy@ipal.net says... |> On Mon, 3 Mar 2008 06:07:02 -0500 krw wrote: |> | In article , phil-news- |> | snipped-for-privacy@ipal.net says... |> |> On Sun, 2 Mar 2008 19:40:58 -0500 krw wrote: |> |> | In article , phil-news- |> |> | snipped-for-privacy@ipal.net says... |> |> |> On Fri, 29 Feb 2008 19:00:47 -0500 krw wrote: |> |> |> | In article , snipped-for-privacy@ipal.net |> |> |> | says... |> |> | |> |> |> |> | One could do an in-USA secure web browser too, just don't get caught |> |> |> |> | "exporting" it (laptop). Since the Internet is "free", the whole |> |> |> |> | thing wend down in flames, silly stories about kids in their |> |> |> |> | bedrooms or not. |> |> |> |> |> |> |> |> Whatever. But it was not re-invented. It was re-implemented. |> |> |> | |> |> |> | To you intentionally compete in the Dimbulb competition, or do you |> |> |> | come by it naturally? |> |> |> |> |> |> Your response makes no sense. Do you not understand the difference between |> |> |> invention and implementation? |> |> | |> |> | Do you not understand the purpose of quotation marks? Do you not |> |> | understand that you're an ass' behind? |> |> |> |> Of course I understand quotation marks. What do they have to do with |> |> invention vs. implementation? |> | |> | Good grief Gert! I thought you could at least figure that out, |> | after having it held right in front of your stupid face! Wow, |> | you're dense! |> |> Really? You make up some concept about quotation marks and think it relates |> to invention vs. innovation, and just expect people to read your mind? | | No, I expect people here to be half-literate.

So then don't make stuff up.

Why, isn't that kind of you. BTW, I did.

What can I tell you; the truth hurts.

MANY here have. Apparently it flies way over your head. ...or perhaps through your ears.

snipped-for-privacy@ipal.net

I'm beginning to think you could fly a 747 in one of Phil's ears and out the other. :(

snipped-for-privacy@ipal.net

Google: ka9wgn You find 13,500 "cases" of Phil, sliced anyway you like it! ;-)

snipped-for-privacy@ipal.net

I get the impression he was run through an industrial 'Mix-master'. That is, after they broke all the blades of of the institution potato peeler to give him the lobotomy.

I wonder if he measures his wire to 12 decimal places before he cuts it, too? He can't have unequal length conductors to confuse those poor electrons, can we? :(

| MANY here have. Apparently it flies way over your head. ...or | perhaps through your ears.

Let's see ... you, Michael A. Terrell, and that bud-- person. People that don't speak specific. Ooooh ... I'm so impressed ... not.

| Google: ka9wgn You find 13,500 "cases" of Phil, sliced anyway you like | it! ;-)

I'm a fun target for people that like to get a response because I do respond.