Let's call this post as the GOLD POST for future references, ok?, please read and answer the following:
We go to "to rise the level" a little more than what has been expressed until the moment, they have been made affirmations, some affronts for any scientific or technological branch in order to improving that will be I now who make questions, if they are not answered in a scientific term I go to conclude and all those which we see these groups you do not has valid analysis elements to hold either in this group or other similar, they are you asked very simple so that if you know what writes or analyzes would have to answer:
1) In a previous post I wrote that the departure and return time of the pulse to the Ionosphere was of about T = 0,66 mili seconds, that gives a frequency F=1/T of 1515 Hertz and if the pulses I indicate should be to 7 Hz is so this a contradiction?, you was fixed in this detail?
2) The Ionosphere and the Earth form a " resonance cavity", that is to say a " spherical condenser" in which one of their plates is the Earth and the other the bottommost of the Ionosphere or of Heaveside layer, assume a distance of some 100 Km, calculate the capacity of the formed spherical condenser and the inductance associate and then calculate the resonance frequency of the system by the classic formulation f = 1/2*Pi * 1/Sqr(L*C), where Sqr it is a square root, L and C inductance and capacity of the cavity, the geometry data are all over known as the radio of the Earth for example and already that you says be expert in antennae and knows to calculate resonance frequencies of the same I invite it to accomplish this simple calculation, gives to you 7 Hertz???
3) We consider our electromagnetic pulse is moved in rectilinear form, all we know that wave travels with an electrical field E(x,t) and a magnetic inducement B(x,t) such that they are perpendicular mutually and perpendicular at the same time to the spread speed vector, now then, it would suffice consider one of these components as E(x,t) since the relationship always it will be E(x,t) = B(x,t)* c, a relationship of magnitude of course and c the speed of the approximate light. We go to consider 2 instants:
E(x,t)= E(x,T+t) + deltaE
The equation shows two situations, one to a time t anyone and other to the time t+T after occurred a reflection most in the Ionosphere, T is the period of reflection of the pulses, there can you to calculate deltaE?, it would suffice to superpose the field calculated in 2) to the field E(x,t) of this equation, obviously if in all instant t deltaE results positive we are "amplifying", but of the contrary are "losing energy". To be helped in their calculations consider the power of the transmitting and the relationship of the Poytyng vector of spread to know how decays the intensity of the electrical field E(x,t) in the space and time, if it does not know it is in my material to download of my site and it is, E 2 = k * P/x2 ,(k=30 in the M.K.S system)all what has a 2 is eleved to the squared, of course this relationship is for a spherical radiator, but equal serves for the analysis and of course ,x = c*t The pseudo engineer analysis is quite simple and it does not specify of complex equations as gradients or curls or tensor relationships that someone as a radioamateur has the knowledge to express , or better yet, it see the answers in the material to download of my web site ( will serve To you to prove their results)
Well, I remain waiting their results and all those which we want to know on what base their affirmations up until now without base, since if it does not base neither explains their all affirmations what write alone will be "stupid" or "noise" and in that case would request to you please goes to posting to groups of religion or political, we wait to confirm will be a good or mad destructive inventors .