Don't forget the diode on the motor to eat the spike as the MOSFET turns
off.
If you run the pin 5 of the 555 to a zener, you can compensate for the
variations in the input voltage.
You want one part called a rheostat. Assuming the motor near full load
at 500 mA then the resistance will be E/I = 10 ohms. Filament control
rheostats were often zero to 25 ohms at around 5 watts. Odds are you
will end up using a 10 ohm resistor. If thats not enough, try 20 ohms
or so.
That's not good. Every problem must be solved by a circuit using either
an LM555 or a PIC, perferably both :>
Earlier, I suggested the LT1083 as a better way to go than the LM317
because of the heat issue. I have also thought of a very ugly circuit
like this:
Input +V
------+------------------+----------------+----- To motor
! ! !
! \ !
! / ---
! -- \ --------- ^
! ! ! ! !
! --- +---/\/\---++----+----- To motor
! --- ! !
\ ! !/e !
/ <----/\/\--+---! PNP !
\ !\ !/
! +---------! NPN
! ! !\e
\ \ !
/ / GND
\ \
! !
GND GND
This requires much less current in the POT than the single transistor one.
The NPN's heat is a lot lower too.
On Sun, 4 Mar 2007 18:09:11 +0000 (UTC), snipped-for-privacy@green.rahul.net (Ken
Smith) wrote:
Hey, LM317s are /nearly/ as traditional an answer to any kind of
electronics problem as the classic 555, & much more traditional than
those new-fangled PICs. ;) (And my science teacher in highschool used
LM3909 as his solution for most things.)
--
W "Some people are alive only because it is illegal to kill them."
. | ,. w ,
Polytechforum.com is a website by engineers for engineers. It is not affiliated with any of manufacturers or vendors discussed here.
All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.