Ballscrew linear actuator desk test at half speed

Oct 21, 2026 Last reply: 1 day ago 3 Replies
Jump to replies (3)

The most surprising detail here is the playback: the carriage is shown at half speed, and even slowed down it looks quick. This is a desk test of a motorized linear actuator built around a ballscrew, a linear rail and a carriage, and the assembly is set to become the shorter axis of a 3D printer.



The hardware choices stand out. The screw is an sfs1620 with a 20mm pitch, driven by a 400 watt AC servo and drive that cost 130 together. The base plate is aluminum, the carriage rides a linear rail block, and a flexible shaft coupler connects the drivetrain. A small sensor board with several wires sits on the carriage, tied into harnesses with lever nuts. The force numbers are big too: 80 pounds of continuous push on the gantry, with 280 pounds available in short bursts.



The maker runs the servo at 50,000 steps per rev, giving 0.0004mm per step, and notes the full 114,000 steps per rev setting would resolve 0.000175mm per step where pulse limits allow it. The planned machine has a 300x600 build plate with 425mm x 700mm of toolhead travel, and speeds around 1000 to 1500 mm/s are the target rather than 2000.



The open item is the screw itself. The current rolled c7 unit works for now, but a c5 ground screw with the same pitch and bk end machining on both sides will replace it for high speed running. If the printer does not work out, the whole assembly might move to an ender 3 y axis instead.


Running the servo at 50,000 steps per rev instead of the full 114,000 seems like a smart call to me. The pulse limit at the top step count caps the bandwidth anyway, and 0.0004mm per step is already far finer than any printer axis needs, so the trade looks sensible rather than a compromise.

I am curious how the swap to the c5 screw is planned. The replacement gets bk end machining on both sides and is rated for 6500 rpm in its planned configuration. Does that machining come with the screw when ordered, or is it something the maker arranges separately? Also wondering whether the flexible shaft coupler carries over.

Since 40mm pitch screws were rejected as too expensive, one option might be keeping the 20mm pitch and pushing the c5 screw toward its 6500 rpm rating once installed. That should raise top speed without the cost of a higher pitch, and the maker already says the screw is not near its critical speed for this length and support method.

Join the Discussion

Have something to add? Share your thoughts — no account required.

Didn't find your answer?

Ask the community — no account required