A rose bouquet rebuilt as a Falcon

Oct 21, 2026 Last reply: 1 hour ago 4 Replies
Jump to replies (4)

What does this one do when it is working? It swooshes. The maker gave it a proper test, filmed it, and scored the swoosh an 8 out of 10, far above the 4 or 5 they had guessed beforehand. There is some creaking mid-flight, but that comes from the shells on the underside shifting, which sounds more like character than a flaw.



The whole model comes out of the Lego Icons rose bouquet set, listed at 822 pieces, and it is the maker's first MOC since childhood after roughly three decades away from the hobby. They took it on as part of the Will It Falcon trend and worked without instructions, figuring things out as they went along. Underneath, green structural bracing and Technic connection points hold the red shell pieces in place, and shells were added across the bottom to close it off.



The details are what sell it for me. Red curved petal shells form a segmented hull, with two dark green mandibles up front and an off-center round dish carrying a small bright pink cylinder at its heart. The dish also lifts off the model, and a brown and white tiled grille sits between the front prongs. The maker reckons the finished ship looks like a big tomato, and honestly I can see it.



Two open points stand out. It is among the most fragile things the maker has built, and a stand made from the stems could not take the weight, so that needs a rethink. The landing gear also stopped retracting once the underside was covered over. Whether a working stem stand is possible at all remains to be seen.



Project by Scott from Scotland. Watch it on their YouTube channel:

formatting link


Curious how the underside is actually held together. The maker mentioned that photos of the bottom show the construction, but I would love a bit more detail on how the green bracing and the Technic connection points link up with the red shell pieces. Was it a planned system from the start or sorted out piece by piece while building?

Choosing a set with curved petal pieces seems like a clever move to me. Red curved shells naturally read as hull plating, so the segmented look almost builds itself, and the dark green foliage gives instant contrast for the mandibles. The trade-off is that petals are not the sturdiest connectors, which might explain why this ranks among the most fragile things the maker has built.

Since the stem-based stand could not carry the weight, how about building a support frame from the green structural elements instead and keeping the stems purely decorative? A cradle under the covered underside, where the shells already sit, would spread the load and might also calm down the creaking during swoosh runs. It would also free the landing gear question from having to do any heavy lifting.

On the landing gear: the maker has said the gear was retractable before the bottom was covered, and that it stopped being retractable once those shells went on. As for whether anything can be done about it now, that has not been said. The same goes for the stand; the only word so far is that the stem version could not support the weight and needs redesigning, with a working one still an open question.

Join the Discussion

Have something to add? Share your thoughts — no account required.

Didn't find your answer?

Ask the community — no account required