Keith P. Walsh is spreading drivel again (August 25, 2007). As usual he is confused, and he may be confusing readers of both the sci.med.dentistry and sci.materials newsgroups. He needs to take some lessons rather than try to give them.
In the last post of this series we saw that the Metals Handbook, Desk Edition (2nd, 1998) defines an amalgam as: "a dental alloy produced by combining mercury with alloy particles of silver, tin, copper, and sometimes zinc".
The time-tested Metals Handbook definition is a sensible description for what an amalgam is. Based on this definition (of course):
Point 4: The phrase "mercury amalgam" is a pleonasm.
Alloys containing gallium or indium (but no mercury) are more sensibly described as alloys, not as amalgams.
Reading Keith's posts is like watching the repeating scenes in the movie "Groundhog Day". It's not like life, or a box of chocolates, because you already know exactly what you're going to get.
Pittsburgh Pete Aka "Dancing With Trolls"
DISCLAIMER
We do not believe what we write, and neither should you. Information furnished to you is for topical (external) use only. This information may not be worth any more than either a groundhog turd, or what you paid for it (nothing). The author may not even have been either sane or sober when he wrote it down. Do not worry, be happy.