They are doing so well with all the other means, I wonder why they are taking all the time and effort for this. And then to run off and leave it ..............
Steve
They are doing so well with all the other means, I wonder why they are taking all the time and effort for this. And then to run off and leave it ..............
Steve
According to the pic about 1/4 down on this page, it looks like some kind of weird morphodite that can't decide _which_ it is.
According to the pic about 1/4 down on this page, it looks like some kind of weird morphodite that can't decide _which_ it is.
According to the pic about 1/4 down on this page, it looks like some kind of weird morphodite that can't decide _which_ it is.
The photo from that news story looks like a Trebuchet.
And not something that can be knocked together from local materials..
I had a couple computer glitches and wasn't sure whether my other FU here got posted - much to my dismay, it seems like it got posted twice, and since then I think I'm wrong - I called the thing a "morphodite," but I think it's technically a catapult that only _looks_ like a trebuchet. But the only difference I can see is the bungee instead of the weight; maybe that's the only technical difference. At first, when I thought, "catapult," I thought of a giant crossbow. (!)
Thanks, Rich
Way less expensive than digging tunnels?
Just to do the troll thing a bit more....
Looks like the trebuchet IS a catapult, but specific in design.
Take care.
Brian Laws>
Ah! "Trebuchet" is a _subset_ of "catapult"! Cool! :-)
Thanks, Rich
"Ignoramus17662" wrote in message news:YaCdnQylWciJtNvQnZ2dnUVZ snipped-for-privacy@giganews.com...
Within memory, an intelligible article entitled "Building a Better Trebuchet" appeared in "Mechanical Engineering" for those motivated to read.
Regards,
Edward Hennessey
Have something to add? Share your thoughts — no account required.
Ask the community — no account required