Pressed-together crankshafts

Just how strong are built-up crankshafts? They're common in very small engines, some of which seem rather highly stressed. They seem less common in larger engines, but those I'm familiar with are high-production types where tooling costs matter less than per-part costs.

For example, if somebody wanted to build a small, one-off diesel engine, say a 200cc v-twin, would a built-up crank have a chance? At the other end of the spectrum, are the cranks in very large marine diesels (think Emma Maersk) built up or monolithic?

Thanks for reading,

bob prohaska

Reply to
bob prohaska
Loading thread data ...

Isn't a Harley Davidson crankshaft "built up" and simply pressed together?

Reply to
John B.

Not sure about Harley but MANY Motorcycle cranks are and many 2 stroke cranks. They work pretty good in applications where there is not much chance of impact / shock loads which have a tendancy to twist built-up cranks out of true. They are also used in applications where comnpactmess is required and there is no room for bolted split-cap rods

Reply to
Clare Snyder

From memory I believe that some single row radial aircraft engines also had built up cranks although I don't remember how they were assembled.

Reply to
John B.

From memory I believe that some single row radial aircraft engines also had built up cranks although I don't remember how they were assembled.

Reply to
Jim Wilkins

You can make one piece with big-ass power hammer and hot steel ;-)

formatting link
Cool old video, the whole thing is interesting if you haven't already seen it...

Reply to
Leon Fisk

Just how strong are built-up crankshafts? They're common in very small engines, some of which seem rather highly stressed. They seem less common in larger engines, but those I'm familiar with are high-production types where tooling costs matter less than per-part costs.

For example, if somebody wanted to build a small, one-off diesel engine, say a 200cc v-twin, would a built-up crank have a chance? At the other end of the spectrum, are the cranks in very large marine diesels (think Emma Maersk) built up or monolithic?

Thanks for reading,

bob prohaska

---------------------------

formatting link
".. it exceeds 50% thermal efficiency in its maximum economy mode."

Reply to
Jim Wilkins

Another application where there was no room for bolted split cap rods.

Reply to
Clare Snyder

The newer Harley motors are using a pressed together crankshaft , the older ones used a bolted assembly with tapered joints located with keys . The newer ones have evidenced a tendency to twist at low RPM/heavy throttle . I know my 1990 has a bolted crank assembly , not sure about the 2009 Sporty but I think it was before the bean counters "improved the profit margin" .

Reply to
Snag

For example, if somebody wanted to build a small, one-off diesel engine, say a 200cc v-twin, would a built-up crank have a chance?

-------------------------------

formatting link

Reply to
Jim Wilkins

Very impressive photos. Thanks for posting!

bob prohaska

Reply to
bob prohaska

I couldn't find any information on whether the Wartsila engine was a built up crank but the Doxford ship engine was, some info here

formatting link
and repairing the damage due to not doing the correct engine starting procedure resulting in slippage of the shrink fit crank
formatting link
. I mentioned that incident to a neighbour's friend who had worked for BOC and he said he had been involved in a similar fix in the docks at Bristol UK.

Reply to
David Billington

Fascinating articles! Thanks for posting!

bob prohaska

Reply to
bob prohaska

Yes, thanks, very interesting.

For a more technical view, this explains submarine Diesels to new recruits fresh off the farm.

formatting link

Reply to
Jim Wilkins

On 7/2/2021 6:04 PM, David Billington wrote: ...

...

Clever ... I wonder if this sort of repair had been used prior or if the author was the first. If first, I have to admire his willingness to jump in the deep end, so to speak.

I got a chuckle out his titles: "RJF Hudson PhD., BAppSc., DMS., CEng., Extra First Class M.O.T FIMarEST., FIMechE., MCMI."

Reply to
Bob Engelhardt

On 7/2/2021 6:04 PM, David Billington wrote: ...

Clever ... I wonder if this sort of repair had been used prior or if the author was the first. If first, I have to admire his willingness to jump in the deep end, so to speak.

I got a chuckle out his titles: "RJF Hudson PhD., BAppSc., DMS., CEng., Extra First Class M.O.T FIMarEST., FIMechE., MCMI."

------ I suspect that every possible sort of failure had occurred soon after a design was introduced. Prior to WW2 engineering was cut-and-try, strengthen whatever broke.

formatting link
"Eventually, in the late 1930s, experimental stress analysis began to be incorporated into the design process."

Reply to
Jim Wilkins

Hi folks! I haven't stopped in for years, but I was so pleased to see that the political stuff (which drove me out in disgust) seems to be just a whimper now. If I was still writing about metalworking, I'd get back into it. But I'm not, so I'm just saying "hello" and it's nice to see so many of you still around.

Bob, I don't know of any unsupercharged diesel engines -- running on diesel fuel -- smaller than about 300 cc or so per cylinder. I'm not a diesel guy and there may be some such engines, but that's what I've heard from diesel people. They've told me that smaller cylinders quench too much to burn diesel fuel without supercharging. Of course, you can "diesel" with ether and maybe some other fuels, but that's something to check out. Those model "diesel" engines that run on ether don't have injection, so purists don't consider them to be "diesels." Just "compression ignition."

As for built-up cranks, there were racing engines in the 1930s, and probably since, that had built-up cranks. SO I'd guess that they can handle the torsional load if you get the press-fit right.

Good to see ya'll, and without the vile political stuff!

Reply to
Ed Huntress

Ed,

Good to see you're still with us and posting, it has been getting quiet on here as even the metal working related stuff is getting less often. I hadn't noticed a reduction in political/gun/survivalist stuff as my filters kept that under control. I had a Davies-Charlton UK made diesel airplane model engine and took it back to Wichita and asked my chemistry teacher where I could get some ether to make the fuel and she was rather concerned about safety and not helpful, IIRC the fuel was ether, amyl nitrate, and castor oil and easy to get in the UK as a pre-mixed fuel but not common in the US in the early 1980s. IIRC a source for ether is engine start spray and people do use it to repair capillary temperature gauges.

Reply to
David Billington

Hiya Dave! I haven't tried to buy ether for decades. I kept a pint can of it in the trunk of my MG when I lived in Michigan, for starting on those 0-temp winter days ( and with a sad Lucas battery), which I guess was like keeping a few sticks of dynamite in the car. Oh well, it worked. and I'm still in one piece.

I see it's relatively quiet here, but the subjects are metalworking-related, like it was when I joined over 20 years ago. It's good to see.

Reply to
Ed Huntress

Hi folks! I haven't stopped in for years, but I was so pleased to see that the political stuff (which drove me out in disgust) seems to be just a whimper now. If I was still writing about metalworking, I'd get back into it. But I'm not, so I'm just saying "hello" and it's nice to see so many of you still around.

Bob, I don't know of any unsupercharged diesel engines -- running on diesel fuel -- smaller than about 300 cc or so per cylinder. I'm not a diesel guy and there may be some such engines, but that's what I've heard from diesel people. They've told me that smaller cylinders quench too much to burn diesel fuel without supercharging. Of course, you can "diesel" with ether and maybe some other fuels, but that's something to check out. Those model "diesel" engines that run on ether don't have injection, so purists don't consider them to be "diesels." Just "compression ignition."

As for built-up cranks, there were racing engines in the 1930s, and probably since, that had built-up cranks. SO I'd guess that they can handle the torsional load if you get the press-fit right.

Good to see ya'll, and without the vile political stuff!

Reply to
Jim Wilkins

PolyTech Forum website is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here. All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.