Hello all Trying to start off with a modest post... About 5 days ago I first tried interacting with an AI (an "Artificial Intelligence"). I had "blanked" the subject with having other things to do; but a headline "Chinese coal-mine transforms productivity with AI" had me think the time to look at the subject had arrived. Hence... Went with "Deepseek" because of received opinion that the Chinese AI's are very good at technical things and are already widely used for process optimisation.
I went with finding out how the science, technology and commercial application had progressed in the 26 to 30 years since doing my research.
It was amazing. Finding out what "won out".
As I settled-in, conversing with the AI, I held a mental check that this is an AI - but in the second by second interaction the only thing that reminded me of that was how much information it had, the range of sources seemingly irrespective of language, etc. eg. to finally see what TMCP (Thermo-Mechanically Controlled-Processed) plate rolling mills look like, it gave me some search terms in Chinese. Those links I pasted into the browser brought up pictures (answer: they look sort of like a "normal" rolling mill, but are a vast size in order to be able to apply the forces to do big per-pass reductions at blood-red down to cherry-red temperature). I did query some parts of the answers it gave, and it came back with more layers of depth to the answer regarding those things, and describing the simplification for brevity it had done previously. Very interesting.
Yesterday I asked the AI about aluminium MIG / aluminum GMAW welds. The conditions it came back with were nothing like I have found good - for too little power. That I queried. I cited my heat-input in kJ/mm, and it came back describing what my welds must be like. It was correct. It went on to become a big discussion about power, "spray" vs. "pulse", etc.
This brings-up "the Turing test", doesn't it? Is there any way for the person at a terminal to know if it is a person or a computer on the other side? Can you make it reveal characteristics which tell you that? The nature of the discussion meant that it was only a remote "mental note" that this is an AI which prevented me from "being drawn-in".
It did make me laugh a couple of times, with the observations it made about the human nature behind technical issues.
I will leave it at that for now. I don't know how this fits on the generally-used scale walks on water <=> passes water
If any has any questions I will try to answer.
My overall perception I pass-on should it be of interest is - certainly this AI works.
Best wishes, Rich S
PS one thing the AI told me - all around the world, regardless of language, welders conjure-up "verbal images" with identical meanings about welds - "sweet-spot", "window" and "{on a} knife-edge" are three it cited.