Changes to FAA space launch rules and nitwit comments

While perusing the daily Federal Register contents for rocket related things, I noticed an item for the FAA's commercial space launch rules. Apparantly this has been in review for some changes for quite a while. Todays notice extended the delay for comments. So if you have a mind (Or even half a mind. Of which, more later.) there is still time to dig through the hundreds of pages of documents and submit a comment.

The DOT has a somewhat more open rule making process than the BATF has ever had and one of the features of this is that they maintain an online "docket" which contains comments and such on proposed rules. While perusing this list I ran across a doozy. Wherein it is shown that any nitwit can, and will, comment.

(Go to:

formatting link
and search on "7953" to see the docket.)

Barb Sachau writes: "... commercial space transportation. this kind of launch hurts americans and other world citizens since it creates ozone, and high use of gasoline and other toxic chemicals into our atmosphere. we are in critical state right now with having good air to breathe, what with excess carbon dioxide, far too many particulates, global warming, acid rain, etc and this kind of allowance creates a much much harder environment for people on earth. i think these commercial space laucnhes must be stopped until people to breathe."

Questions: Does Barb drive an SUV or ride a bike? Where did she learn English?

Curriousity overwhelmed me so I Googled Barb. She seems to be very busy and also appears to be one of those wacko PETA (and I don't mean People Eating Tasty Animals) types. She posted (I hope that there is only one Barb Sachau) "I agree. It is a matter of education. Someone has to show you how awful it is to eat sentient living beings. You have to be taught." To which I reply:

formatting link

Note that the amateur rocket exemption (under 200,000 lb-s, 15 second action time, 12 psi ballistic coefficient, IIRC) is contained within these FAA rules. I didn't look but I don't think they are proposing to change them.

Reply to
David Schultz
Loading thread data ...

During the line about "the man eating celery" a vision of the Woody Allen movie Sleeper popped into my head. I believe he knocked someone senseless with a carrot IIRC.

Chuck

Reply to
Chuck Rudy

It needs to be changed to 45 seconds as the original rule drafted stated.

Reply to
Jerry Irvine

laucnhes

Well, _something_ is obviously cutting off oxygen to her brain. ;)

People like this should be rounded up and sent to remedial science class.


Reply to
raydunakin

That round-up would certainly include you.

Reply to
Jerry Irvine

Would it not be more appropriate to someone like you, who flunked out in aerospace science, and then had to switch majors to economics?

Reply to
Dave Grayvis

Jerry & economics!!! ROFL!!!!

Reply to
Phil Stein

Or....... Subject them to the science of Eugenics!

Reply to
Kurt

Perhaps we should subject her to the toxic byproducts of modern O2/H2 fueled rockets? DHMO is deadly, I hear.

(SRBs and Hydrazine are pretty nasty, but hopefully we will continue to move away from those where possible)

Reply to
John Bowles

Someone email this IDT and point her to

formatting link

Bob Kaplow NAR # 18L TRA # "Impeach the TRA BoD" >>> To reply, remove the TRABoD!

Reply to
Bob Kaplow

Do you really want to do that?! I'd heard tell of a town in California that almost passed a law banning DHMO use after reading up on it. Only at the last moment did someone put the jumper cables on their ears and figure out what it really was. Sigh, our tax dollars at work..... I agree with the round up though. Eugenic sterilization to keep the (mental) traits from being passed on, just in case.

Chuck

Reply to
Zathras of the Great Machine

PolyTech Forum website is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here. All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.