CSI: BATFE Stooges Unit

A United States government agency is currently engaged in a propaganda/ misinformation war directed at the people of the United States. They're using TV to accomplish it.

The makers of CSI do not want to teach people how to be better criminals. They rig the plots so that they don't quite work. Let everyone search their house for a window cleaner containing HF so they can kill themselves. Let people try to blow themselves up by burping gasoline while talking on a cell phone.

The plots are deliberately flawed. I'm ok with that, although it's not as fun.

The BATFE agents were asked to come up with an explosive system for the Dec. 11th, 2003 show.

The BATFE chose Ammonium Perchlorate. It doesn't work, and it makes the public think that a common fuel for toy rocketry is a threat to every American, especially the ones who fight terrorism like the sky marshals.

If the facts don't back your position, why not start a propaganda war? Lie to the American public for their own good, right?

This way, even though the regulations are unnecessary, stifle commerce, and are draconian, the American public will approve them.

It's a guerrilla marketing campaign, and not the only one going on right now.

Watch CSI, CSI: Miami, CSI: Mayberry, Without a Trace, Without a Clue, Cold Case, Case of Cold Beer, Law and Order, Law and Order: SVU, Law and Order:CI, Law and Order: Elevator Inspectors, and Law and Order: Jag.

You have no right to genetic privacy. If you don't volunteer your DNA, you're either a criminal, evil, scum, or evil criminal scum.

Never mind that police departments can't keep up with the DNA samples they have. In Chicago, rape victims are getting together to pay to have their own rape kits tested for DNA so that the rapists can be caught. The cops don't have the money to do the DNA tests. I guess catching rapists isn't a high priority item.

We're being played folks. I hate to say it, but the majority of the American public is falling for it.

Zooty

Reply to
zoot
Loading thread data ...

Dang. Only saw the other thread after posting this.

Sorry.

Zooty

Reply to
zoot

If the majority of the American public weren't gullible idiots, most of the politicians today wouldn't be in office. Why should we expect them to play rocketry any differently than they play any other emptional topic they can exploit: health care, insurance, defense, crime, social security, welfare, trade policies, etc?

Reply to
David

zoot wrote in news: snipped-for-privacy@4ax.com:

I had to laugh at using HF acid as a glass cleaner,considering HF acid is used to ETCH glass.

Reply to
Jim Yanik

Oh it'll clean glass... just CLEAN OFF

Reply to
tai fu

CLR and other common glass cleaners contain HF acid. We used a 10% solution of HF acid to clean glass when I was in the Air Force; it worked great.

Mario Perdue NAR #22012 Sr. L2 for email drop the planet

formatting link
"X-ray-Delta-One, this is Mission Control, two-one-five-six, transmission concluded."

Reply to
Mario Perdue

I checked CLR on the net. The MSDS sheet can be found at:

http://65.170.37.131/pdffiles//GENERALPDF/Jelmar-CLRCalciumLimeRustRemover-V2.PDF TinyURL:

formatting link
The MSDS sheet lists

  1. Water 7732-18-5 NE 68-74
  2. Glycolic Acid 79-14-1 NE 13-16
  3. Sulfamic Acid 5329-14-6 NE 3-6
  4. Disodium Capryloamphodipropionate 68815-55-4 NE 4-7
  5. Ethylene Glycol n-Butyl Ether 111-76-2 20 ppm TLV 1-4
  6. Citric Acid

as the ingredients.

Here's the URL for some good information for working with HF:

formatting link
TinyURL:
formatting link
From
formatting link
"Both liquid and vapor forms of HF cause severe and slow healing burns on contact with the skin, eyes, or mucous membranes. Burns from dilute solutions of HF or low concentrations of HF vapor might not be immediately visible or painful. Burns from HF solutions with less than

50% concentration may not be felt immediately. B urns from HF solutions of 20 % or less concentration can take hours to become visible. The burns are characterized by appearance of a tough white coagulation with persistent excruciating pain, progressive destruction of tissue which could include decalcification and necrosis of bone."

Zooty

Reply to
zoot

That ain't nuthin, Mario. Back in the day, we used to clean the leaded sealant off our hands with a scrub brush and MEK! Same for the green zinc chromate primer.

steve

Reply to
system user

http://65.170.37.131/pdffiles//GENERALPDF/Jelmar-CLRCalciumLimeRustRemover-V2.PDF>

The only home cleaning product that I know of that contains HF is 'Whink'. It's also the only product I know of that does a good job of removing rust stains.

formatting link

Reply to
DaveL

From the MSDS sheet:

Incompatibility (Materials to Avoid) Avoid alkalis and oxidizers, bleaching agents or other chemicals. Also metals and glass.

Whink is 2.5-3% HF. That's far more dilute than the supposed window cleaning HF the other person mentioned.

At 2.5-3%, the stuff rates a 3 on the HMIS health rating. The bottle says, in part:

DANGER; MAY BE FATAL OR CAUSE PERMANENT DAMAGE. CAUSES SEVERE BURNS WHICH MAY NOT BE IMMEDIATELY PAINFUL OR VISIBLE. VAPOR HARMFUL.

This is not stuff you use in a room to clean your windows.

Still, this isn't the main point. The main point is the government is deliberately feeding the American public false information in order to affect the public's perception of a policy the government has instituted.

Zooty

Reply to
zoot

I'll attribute that to poor memory; it's been awhile since I've had any CLR around but I was pretty sure it had HF acid. However, I know that the presoak used by many car washes, Appeal, contains it. Also Brite 10 is a cleaner for aluminum and glass that contains HF acid. I'm absolutely certain we used it in the USAF.

Mario Perdue NAR #22012 Sr. L2 for email drop the planet

formatting link
"X-ray-Delta-One, this is Mission Control, two-one-five-six, transmission concluded."

Reply to
Mario Perdue

I think I may have seen some cleaning sprays for wire wheels at the auto parts store that contained HF... seemed a bit dodgy to put that in a consumer product if you ask me.

-dave w

Reply to
David Weinshenker

Been there, done that. :-)

Mario Perdue NAR #22012 Sr. L2 for email drop the planet

formatting link
"X-ray-Delta-One, this is Mission Control, two-one-five-six, transmission concluded."

Reply to
Mario Perdue

Actually, I don't know why I said wire wheels - I think they were for cleaning cast "mag" wheels. (I'll have to remember to take a look the next time I'm there...)

-dw

Reply to
David Weinshenker

There's several cleaners with Appeal in their name. How about a URL to the MSDS sheet?

HF dissolves glass. Brite 10 is an aluminum cleaner that has the feature that short application times with rapid rinsing or neutralization won't damage glass.

It also has to be used outside.

Interestingly, the MSDS for Brite 10

formatting link
only lists :

Sulfuric Acid 1 mg/m3 1 mg/m3 7664-93-9

It's possible it's undergone a reformulation, or the MSDS is really screwed up.

In any case, HF is not something someone's going to use to clean glass in their home - it's not a glass cleaner, requires special rinsing or neutralization, outgasses a truly nasty chemical, etc.

Did you work inside? in a closed hotel room with the stuff?

Zooty

Reply to
zoot

The government is exempt from everything hazmat. They alone are allowed to use what works and damn the consequences.

Reply to
Jerry Irvine

It seems that is a characteristic of any authority tryig to maintain power against facts and public opinion whether the U.S. Government or Tripoli.

Jerry

Reply to
Jerry Irvine

I have seen Rosenfield clean production greases and such off the external surfaces of SU motors with MEK to accept the labels that make the motor jam in the rocket when they heat up and melt.

He did that with a lot of them too.

Jerry

Reply to
Jerry Irvine

Just ask the people who worked with beryllium for the nuclear weapons programs.

The government knew that the workers were being exposed to damaging levels. To keep costs down, the government decided keep the toxicity data secret.

It wasn't because there was no other reasonable way to protect our country.

The government lied because it was cheaper to not warn the workers.

Zooty

Reply to
zoot

Yep, nothing works better on fuel tank sealant (8802 types A, B, E or F)... MEK rocks... Until it kills you. I saw the fumes curl a guy's contacts once. Nobody knew he wore contacts, and he didn't know about MEK fumes... near eyesight mishap.

Even less than 10 years ago, we were bathing elbow deep in it after a integral fuel cell repair job. After it was eliminated, the only thing that works is wearing it away... or using a rough scrubbing pad... and losing some superficial skin.

~ Duane Phillips.

Reply to
Duane Phillips

PolyTech Forum website is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here. All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.