Based on my reading, and Ray's comment, I'm dropping this idea like so many others I've had. If fffg will suffice, I am set.
As I said above, I've already dropped this idea. The stuff is way too unstable, and just downright toxic. While fascinating to consider, It has no merit in a rocketry application.
We looked into the possibility of making a single use airbag based ejection charge but the costs at the time were prohibitive. The CO2 ejection system CD3 you can buy from Rouse-Tech is very expensive but only about a tenth of the cost of the airbag in quantities we need in this sport. Now if there were 1.7 to 1.8 million users for the product, we could drive the cost down under $50 each charge but still, that is not a good thing to pour money into for research when a half penny's worth of FFFG will work just fine...
Cool ideas may eventually become marketable. Not sure this will unless we greatly expand the hobby.
Greatly expanding the hobby strikes fear in the hearts of NAR and TRA leadership because such a thing could nit be controlled with an iron fist like 2500 people stupid enough to subscribe to HPR magazine, and apply for ATF permits for exempt PADs, are.
"The whole aim of practical politics is to keep the populace alarmed (and hence clamorous to be lead to safety) by menacing it with an endless series of hobgoblins, all of them imaginary."
- H.L. Mencken (1880-1956)
and :)
"And of course always remember: What your ATF inspector says is true, nothing else matters. Not the Orange Book, not physics, not logic, and not the law."
- Tony Alcocer
"Cheer up, they said, things could be worse. So we cheered up and they were right - it got worse."
I've used both 3f and 4f. with either I pack the charge cannon with wadding real tight. I use cardboard tubes for the charge cannon so it can split, pvc and metal charge cannons have been known to blow holes in the sides of body tubes sometimes.
Permits for BP where I am at are the same for 2,3 or 4f.
Why do so many people "naturally assume" people suddenly cannot be trusted with gunpowder, despite 230 years of constant usage with franlky lower average intelligence in the past.
Or do we just want to make things MORE CONVENIENT for police?
PolyTech Forum website is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here.
All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.