huh?

retief, far and away. i believe the first was 1959 i read a retief story once where he was an old man and he goes back to lily to lead a revolution with "forged" documents. at the end, he is the emporer of the lily empire and magnum asks him where he got the fake docs that looked so good. he replys they weren't fake....a long setup to that point, (almost 40 years of stories) but typical laumer. wish o could find that summabitch again.

Reply to
someone
Loading thread data ...

It's on the Baen site, in the free library, if it's not in "Retief!" , it's in one of the others.

Cheers, Gary B-)

Reply to
Gary R. Schmidt

yeah, I got inside a 111 at an air museum in Arizona. very strange bomb bay indeed, but it seemed practical...

Craig

Reply to
crw59

i dunno, i've looked for it for many years and a lot of retoef "experts" tell me i'm lying and no such story. but i know what i read. the beginning starts a lot like the sweatie storie with him on a ship, except he's 30 years older. i really want to reread.

Reply to
someone

formatting link
_eat_ shrubbery. Ni!

Pat

Reply to
Pat Flannery

That would make it move slightly to one side, wouldn't it? Okay, we make a lightweight bomb, and seal it inside of a big Styrofoam sphere, like a giant Wham-O Tracball:

formatting link
then mount these in C-130's and spin them up like Dambuster bombs before rolling them out the back. The Magnus effect makes them fall on other paths than merely ballistic as they hit the high speed airflow behind the plane. In short, you can fly to one side of the enemy and hurl bombs at him diagonally like explosive curveballs from hell. You can fly right over him, and after you pass and he thinks it's safe to look around, he will not have noticed that thing you released out of the back which climbed several hundred feet above the aircraft before starting its slow descent...as the nuclear weapon in it arms. :-)

Pat

Reply to
Pat Flannery

It was an efficient way of carrying a lot of medium/small bombs in a fuselage of that shape. On the civilian version of that plane before its true purpose was revealed, the bomb bay was the the aircraft's "smoking compartment" A rather large area given the small passenger complement of the airliner (ten, with four in the "smoking compartment") Still it beat the six passengers on the Do-17 "airliner/mailplane" who had to be be gymnasts just to get aboard and take their seats.

Pat

Reply to
Pat Flannery

neither onkle adolph nor his pilot, hans bauer liked the 111 as a airliner. apparently there was no way to seal it tight so it was drafty, cold, and noisy. like their counterparts, the b25 boys, almost all the 111 vets have hearing aids, usually two. i knew one when i was a kid in the vaterland and he was deef as a post. his faverite word was VASS?

Reply to
someone

Guess it depends on which way the wind is blowing, and which side of the aircraft it comes off of...and how heavy it is. But that's what the little wedgies are for:

formatting link

Reply to
Rufus

...what, behind the rabbit?

Reply to
Rufus

Yes, that's the story I recall, and I *read* it in a Baen Free book, sometime in that last 6 to 12 months, probably "Retief" , but it may have been in one of the others.

No, it's in "Retief", it's called "DIPLOMAT-AT-ARMS" and it is Chapter

2, at , so stop whingeing and go and read it!

Cheers, Gary b-)

Reply to
Gary R. Schmidt

i've read diplomat many times. wer're talking two different stories. and i don't whine, so intercourse the penguin, ducky.

Reply to
someone

Cut and pasted from Chapter 2, "DIPLOMAT-AT-ARMS", of the book "Retief", on the Baen site:

Reply to
Gary R. Schmidt

that's diplomat? from the first book? i can't be remembering that poorly.

Reply to
someone

snipped-for-privacy@some.domain wrote: [SNIP]

Yes.

You do know that there was a novella/short-story called "Diplomat-At-Arms" (which is what this is) and a book called the same? Which, AFAIRC, is *not* an expansion of the short. (May also be the old "different titles for different markets" thing, too.)

Cheers, Gary B-)

Reply to
Gary R. Schmidt

PolyTech Forum website is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here. All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.