Jim> I like the Tamiya clear colors for painting light bulbs and Jim> lenses. Beyond that I don't like their paint for brushing or Jim> air brushing. Where I find other acrylic paints perform Jim> better I would put them all in the category of "third world Jim> paints". They are very useful in painting small irregular Jim> surfaces, like figures, where surface quality is not Jim> noticeable. Acrylic paints have high surface tension, even Jim> when extended, and have to be applied heavily to cover Jim> well. They also start to cure rapidly and the cure is not Jim> reversible so getting good blending with a brush on a large Jim> flat surface is a real crap shoot. Acrylics can do quite well Jim> when airbrushing if you are doing matt or flat Jim> finishes. Acceptable results are very subjective and what Jim> looks great to one may look really bad to another. I find Jim> that the best way to evaluate your finish is to take a photo Jim> of it in the same perspective as the prototype and then Jim> compare.
Jim, IIRC the clear colors are all enamels (oil-based, thinnable with turpentine). Quite different from the (water-based) acrylics you next mention. I don't believe "3rd world paints" is fair, although there was a time when I cursed water-based acrlyics from Gunze. It is probably true that the water-based acrylics are better for air-brushing than hand-brushing, I agree there. From a technique point of view I suggest NOT to apply heavy coats, but to apply progressive coatings to get required coverage OVER A BASE COAT. This should improve things a lot. I'm still in love with enamels since I grew up with Humbrol, and enthusiastically received Xtracolor.
In general, the laquer-based acrylics seem to be much much better than water-based from an adhesion and drying point - but are much more dangerous to your health. I will recommend Gunze lacquer-based acrlyics any day (that's the Mr. Color label).
Who the heck posted first here??? Regarding Japanese water-based acrylics (Gunze and Tamiya) I suggest not using water, but the company thinning agents instead (either one is fine for both). Less bubbles, better mixing and adhesion - but the problems I experienced could be due to the quality of the water I was having to use.
I'm not sure, but adhesion is definitely less solid than laquer-based acrylics and enamels. It may also depend on what you are thinning it with. Water-based acrylics can rub off easily, and should be sealed if possible (using enamel to seal will allow water-based or lacquer-based acrylic or oil-based enamel to go over in a second coat, camouflage, or what have you).