That is correct. However, if that 269-269 tie had materialized, another monkey wrench would have been introduced. One of the WV electors, had already said, that in such a situation, he would go against his state, and cast his vote for Mr. Kerry. Disappointing, but again, within the Constitution, as the electors are under no legal obligation to vote the way their state voted. This has happened before, most notably in the election of Rutherford Hayes, in which, I believe, *several* electors went against their states' citizenry.